This effect was seen in patients receiving IVT ± EVT (SMD = .74; 95% CI = .08 to 1.41; P = .028) but did not reach statistical significance in those receiving EVT ± IVT (SMD = .31; 95% CI = −.02 to .65; P = .067).
← all excerpts
Role of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Prognosis of Acute Ischaemic Stroke After Reperfusion Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
2
0.0670
0.1230
The sentences
However, subgroup analyses failed to reach statistical significance in both IVT ± EVT (SMD = .50; 95% CI = −.14 to 1.13; P = .123) and EVT ± IVT groups (SMD = .28; 95% CI = −.33 to .89; P = .376), with a study where all treatment combinations were reported forming a third group (SMD = 1.16; 95% CI = .43 to 1.89; P = .002).