a clear trendp = 0.055
In this case, the association of esRAGE with malnutrition was non statistically significant, even if a clear trend of association was evident (OR 1.33; 95% CI 0.98–2.38; p = 0.055).
In this case, the association of esRAGE with malnutrition was non statistically significant, even if a clear trend of association was evident (OR 1.33; 95% CI 0.98–2.38; p = 0.055).
The same pattern, even if it did not reach statistical significance, was noticeable for cRAGE distribution.