at the limits of significanceP = .061
Lymphopenia was more common in GBS-C+ ( P = .025), and persisted even when the neurologic onset had followed the resolution of the antecedent infection, while CRP was at the limits of significance ( P = .061).
Lymphopenia was more common in GBS-C+ ( P = .025), and persisted even when the neurologic onset had followed the resolution of the antecedent infection, while CRP was at the limits of significance ( P = .061).
Facial involvement was prevalent in the GBS-C+ group (5/10 patients, vs 2/10, but the difference did not reach statistical significance); other clinical features (dysautonomia, sensory signs and symptoms, consciousness disturbances) were also similar between the 2 groups.