As can be seen in Figure 3 and Table 1 , when contrasting the performance of both groups in each IGT block, the group that most automatically rated the ambiguous faces as negative was also the one that performed significantly better in blocks 2 and 3, as well as showing a significant trend towards better performance in block 4.
← all excerpts
Implicit Negativity Bias Leads to Greater Loss Aversion and Learning during Decision-Making.
2
—
—
The sentences
Specifically, those who most automatically rated ambiguous faces as negative performed better in the second and third blocks of the IGT and showed a trend towards better performance in the fourth block.