approached significancep = 0.064
The comparison between tACS and tDCS ( M = 6.8, SD = 5.3) approached significance ( p = 0.064, 95% CI = [− 0.01, 0.59]), with more errors committed in the former group.
The comparison between tACS and tDCS ( M = 6.8, SD = 5.3) approached significance ( p = 0.064, 95% CI = [− 0.01, 0.59]), with more errors committed in the former group.
Participants made significantly more memory errors (i.e., total intrusions and repetitions) during theta tACS compared to sham stimulation, with the comparison to tDCS trending towards significance.