Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,614 sentences · 1 filter applied

extremely significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
According to a chi-square test, out of 3,178 markers, 96 markers on the map showed distorted segregations ( P < 0.01) even though the extremely significant SNPs ( P < 0.01) were excluded, and the total segregation distortion ratio was 3.02%.
highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Variance analysis of MVN indicated that the effect of genotypic variance was highly significant ( P < 0.01) in single environments and across all environments, while the genotype × environment (G × E) interaction was highly significant ( P < 0.01) for across environments but environment variance was not significant.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Moreover, the three-way interaction of treatment × cultivar × year was highly significant ( Figure 2 , p < 0.01), suggesting that the combined effects of drought, genotype, and growing season are complex and non-additive. 3.2 Oat drought resistance index The drought resistance index (DI) of different oat cultivars over two years is presented in Figure 3 .
highly significantP ≤ 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation of leaf photosynthetic pigment content, photosynthetic characteristics, photosynthetic CO 2 curve characteristic parameters, and related enzyme activities with fruit yield As shown in Figure 8 , the SGW of ‘Flame Seedless’ grapes showed a highly significant positive correlation with the LSP, V cmax , Pn, WUE, and RuBisCO activity ( P ≤ 0.01) and offered a significant positive correlation with Chl a content and Chl b content ( P ≤ 0.05).
highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
3.5 Effect of Si-NPs and IBA on proline and total protein level under Cr-stress Statistically highly significant ( P < 0.01) reducing impact was found under Cr stress for proline and total protein contents in freesia plants compared to the control.
highly significantP<0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
V, N, and T had significant effects on both fresh and dry weight (P<0.01), while the interaction effects of two or three of them reached highly significant levels on fresh weight (P<0.01), but the interaction of the three factors did not have significant effects on dry weight.
highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of variance and general yield response The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed highly significant effects ( P < 0.01) of genotype (V) and nitrogen application rate (N) on grain yield and all measured yield components, with the exception of the effect of N rate on filled grain percentage, which was significant at P < 0.05 ( Table 2 ).