Single cross hybrids showed a highly significant (P<1%) variation for grain yield, plant height, ear height, and ear length at three locations.
Excerpts
(7) T a n n i n = + 2.896 − 0.0766 A − 0.116 B − 0.0583 C − 0.0161 D − 0.0550 A B + 0.0008 A C − 4.3108 A D + 0.0006 B C + 0.0004 B D − 4.6296 C D + 0.0283 A 2 + 0.0533 B 2 + 0.0004 C 2 + 0.0001 D 2 The results of the statistical analysis indicated that the effects of incubation time (D) and quadratic model terms (C 2 and D 2 ) on tannin content were highly significant at p < 0.01.
Matrix analysis showed highly significant positive correlations (P ≤ 0.01) of the V concentration in water with the Ni and Zn concentration in water, the biological oxygen demand (BOD), and the Zn concentration in WH; the Cr concentration with the Fe and Co concentrations in water; the Mn concentration with the Co concentration in water; t
After 12 days of treatment with different drugs, compared to the model group, the PF-treated hepatoma-bearing mice exhibited a significant reduction in tumor volume and weight (P < 0.05), while the Sor-treated and combination therapy groups showed a highly significant decrease in both tumor volume and weight (P < 0.01).
Disease progress rate was calculated to all sorghum genotypes in the two cropping years and highly significant ( p < 0.01) difference among some of the tested sorghum genotypes were observed ( Table 2 ).
The difference in RS content between germplasm lines from Asia and Oceania was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01).
What is interesting to note is that we found that a question commonly used to investigate trust – “ Do you agree that most people could be trusted ?” or trust in the average person—“generalized trust” have a positive and highly significant effect (p < 0.01) on relaxing the wheat varieties constraint.
The results showed that the D 2 between the clusters was highly significant (P = 0.01), indicating a high degree of genotype diversity.
The highest mean concentration of total hardness was recorded in river water sample (422.67 ± 23.79 CaCO 3 mg/L) and there was highly significant difference (p < 0.01) between the mean value of total hardness obtained from river and reservoir water sample.
subtilis immunized mice were elevated compared to the control group, both of them highly significant ( p < 0.01), and the corresponding serum-specific IgG antibodies were effective in neutralizing PCV2d virulence.
Means of root length, root diameter, root weight, marketable root yield, and root dry matter content were highly significant (p < 0.01) in the three-way interaction between sites, OFSP varieties, and NPSB rates.
3.2 GCA and SCA variances Under optimum conditions, the effect of environment was highly significant (P ≤ 0.01) for all traits ( Table 6 ).
IBM SPSS Statistics 20 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) ( P < 0.05, significant; P < 0.01, highly significant) and Pearson correlation analysis.
2 , a one-way ANOVA was conducted on batting accuracy in the retention test and the transfer test, and the between-group F = 10.324, p < 0.01, for the three groups in the retention test was highly significant; in the transfer test, the between-group F = 12.311, p < 0.01, and the between-group difference was highly significant.
AMMI's stability value (ASV) was calculated to rank genotypes in terms of stability using the following equation [ 6 ]: (6) A M M I s t a b i l i t y v a l u e ( A S V ) = [ S S I P C A 1 ( I P C A 1 s c o r e ) S S I P C A 2 ] + [ I P C A 2 s c o r e ] 2 3 Results 3.1 Analyses of variance and performance of the genotypes Single-site ANOVA revealed highly significant (P < 0.01) differences among the 18 soybean genotypes for grain yield in each of the test locations, except in Mokwa and Sabuwa ( Table 4 ).
Biomarker enzymes such as glutathione-S-transferase, catalase, acetylcholine esterase, lipid peroxidase and reduced glutathione showed physiological stress and highly significant (p < 0.01) towards pH 7.6 and 7.8 treatments.
3.4 Leaf metabolites The effect of treatments on most of the leaf metabolites ranged from significant (P < 0.05) to highly significant (P < 0.01).
The estimated annual direct genetic trend (0.036 kg/year) was positive and highly significant (p < 0.01).
According to the analysis variance ( Table 6 ), the effect of factor A on hydrolytic activity was highly significant ( p < 0.01), that of factor C was significant ( p < 0.05), and that of factor B was not significant ( p > 0.05).
3.2 Effect of soaking time on the physical quality of the meat analog Soaking treatment did not show a significant effect (p < 0.001) on the texture of lupine protein meat analog sample but there was a little significant effect (p < 0.01) on the pH value of the soaked lupine flour sample ( Table 2 ).
Results The total incidence of HDP was 45.17 ‰ (95 % CI: 44.14‰–46.20 ‰), and the subtypes of HDP showed an increasing trend from 2012 to 2021 (all P < 0.01).
Analysis for variance The analysis of variance (ANOVA) results shown in Table 2 reveal that the environment by genotype interaction effect is either highly significant (p-value <0.01) or significant (0.01 < p-value <0.05) or marginally significant (0.05 < p-value <0.1) on all 12 traits, indicating environmental variations among the tested varieties for yield and yield-related traits.
The liquid‒solid ratio (A), the extraction temperature (B) and the ultrasonic power (C), which affect the extraction of anthocyanins, reached a highly significant level (p < 0.01).
In addition, the protein levels of COX-2 and iNOS in the liver tissue exhibited an increasing trend with the occurrence of acute ALD ( P < 0.01), but they were significantly reduced after administration of medium- and high-dose RDAE ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01) ( Fig. 7 A–G).
The analysis shows all indicators are highly significant (p < 0.01) except for demographic items.