Barely Significant

Excerpts

8,476 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp > 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, the reduction in blood glucose at 24 h was highly significant ( p > 0.001), as, except for the low glimepiride-low papaya leaf combination, the effect extended to 72 h, demonstrating that papaya leave extract can interact directly with the cells or in a complementary manner to induce hypoglycemic effect [ 56 ].
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After treatment with a high concentration of ox-LDL, it was observed that the relative mRNA expression level of β-catenin also showed a highly significant increasing trend ( p < 0.001), with the relative mRNA expression level of β-catenin approximately doubled compared to the control group.
highly significantp -value < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The highly significant ( n = 5, r 2 = 0.99, p -value < 0.001) correlation observed ( Figure 5 ) between the amounts of degraded chlorophyll and produced cis -vaccenic acid photoproducts, and the lack of cis -vaccenic photoproducts in the bacterial control strongly suggest that the photooxidation of cis -vaccenic acid in bacteria is associated with the photosensitizing properties of chlorophyll a in senescent E. huxleyi cells.
showed a trendp = 0.0010.0× alpha
After ischemia, relative delta frequency was greater, while the relative theta, alpha, and beta frequencies were less after ischemia vehicle, ischemia apigenin ( Figure S1A–D ), and ischemia S3 ( Figure S2A–D ; except for the theta band, which only showed a trend towards being lower) for the entire 72 h recovery period compared with the sham ischemia group ( p = 0.001 vs. ischemia vehicle, p = 0.006 vs. ischemia apigenin, p = 0.030 vs. ischemia S3).
highly significantp ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
GraphPad Prism 9.5 software was used for plotting, and statistical significance was expressed as * p ≤ 0.05, indicating significance; ** p ≤ 0.01, highly significant; *** p ≤ 0.001, extremely significant; **** p ≤ 0.0001; ns, there is no significant difference. 5.