The increase in both cell death fractions by combination treatment was highly significant, as compared to the single treatments as well as compared to control cells ( p < 0.01; Figure 4 ).
Excerpts
A correlation analysis between GL and GW showed a highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) but negative association (r = −0.604 **) between these two traits.
The results of the SSP analysis of variance showed that temperature and tissue × gene have highly significant ( p < 0.01) effect on the expression of S. maximus PPAR genes.
Differences between the wild-type and transgenic tobacco plants were designated as significant (* P < 0.05) and extremely significant (** P < 0.01).
With increasing concentrations of NPD, a dose-dependent recovery of cells was observed in G2/M, which became highly significant at 25 and 50 μg/mL NPD ( p < 0.01) at 48 h of co-treatment ( Figure 4 c). 2.5.
The Results of Monomer Units and Antioxidant Activities Analysis Firstly, the F test showed that the standardized empirical linear regression equation between the monomer units of Rhodiola crenulata PAs and antioxidant activity was extremely significant ( p ≤ 0.01 ).
A single asterisk indicates significant differences (0.01 < P value < 0.05) and a double asterisk indicates extremely significant differences ( P value < 0.01).
qRT-PCR validation showed a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.01) with the RNA-Seq generated data.
The resulting differences were stated as significant if the p -values were less than 0.05 (* p ≤ 0.05) or as highly significant for p -values less than 0.01 (** p ≤ 0.01) or less than 0.001 (*** p ≤ 0.001).
ANOVA results showed that the differences among RILs of mapping population were highly significant for both traits ( p < 0.01, Table S3 ).
* indicates a significant difference compared to the control (0.01 < p < 0.05); ** indicates an extremely significant difference compared to the control ( p < 0.01). 5.
Differences were designated significant at values * p < 0.05, highly significant at ** p < 0.01 and very highly significant at *** p < 0.001 and were labeled with asterisks.
Results indicated highly significant differences in triglycerides ( p < 0.01), total cholesterol ( p < 0.01), LDL ( p < 0.01) and VLDL cholesterol ( p < 0.01).
Histomorphometrical measurement illustrated a significantly decreased bone area due to EAO (0.361 ± 0.020 mm 2 ) and nearly significant reduction in the adjuvant group (Adj; 0.453 ± 0.043 mm 2 ) compared to the control group (Cont; 0.594 ± 0.048 mm 2 , p < 0.01 vs.
In detail, apoA-Ib.2-g.183A>T showed highly significant association with body length (BL) and body weight (BW) ( p < 0.01), and the individuals with genotype AT had a higher BW (6.5%) than the individuals with genotype AA.
In contrast, both 0.5 mM and 1.0 mM concentrations resulted in highly significant increases in climbing rates ( p < 0.01).
Statistically significant difference was set at p < 0.05 and highly significant difference was set at p <0.01.
In MAC-T cells, siRNA 416 had a highly significant interference effect on the COL6A1 gene, with an interference efficiency of 68.3% to 75.1% at the mRNA level ( Figure 3 a; p < 0.01).
A highly significant correlation ( r = 0.926, p < 0.01) existed among the disease AUDPC readings at three different trials.
amblycephala , were predicted for the 44 highly significant differently-expressed miRNAs ( p < 0.01), which were identified in this study.
Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05 and extremely significant when p < 0.01.
Accordingly, correlation analysis of the phototoxicity values obtained for the two PSs revealed a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.01; Pearson two-tailed correlation, data not shown). 2.1.2.
Phenotypic Evaluation The analysis of variance for each treatment revealed highly significant differences ( P < 0.01) in all 24 studied traits between the 96 genotypes (data not shown).
The ANOVA of the quadratic regression model from the experimental data of microbial lipid biomarkers demonstrated that the model was highly significant with Fisher’s F -test values ranged from 8.84 to 12.63 ( p -value < 0.01).
A highly significant ( p < 0.01) difference in the afternoon THI values were observed for the TNZ and heating chambers, which observed average values of 69.42 ± 0.05 and 94.76 ± 0.45, respectively. 2.2.