Excerpts

There was a highly significant overall difference in the reduction in the possum tCCI between blocks (F 2,19 = 37.9, p < 0.001) ( Fig 6 ).

Differences are considered significant if P < 0.05 (denoted with *) and highly significant if P < 0.001 (denoted with **).

Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ2(741) = 19,644.17, p < .001), further confirming the appropriateness of the analysis.

The regression model explained highly significant proportions ( P < 0.001) and 43%, 34%, 35%, 49% of total variance in the 2018EC ranking for 50m, 100m, 200m, and 400m races, respectively.

spinosum were positively correlated (R = 0.76 to 0.85) to AZA-1, -2 and -33 quantities ( Fig 8 ), and Pearson's product-moment correlation tests revealed highly significant correlations (p ≤ 0.001) between the four variables.

In the later time window (700–900 ms), grammaticality yielded a highly significant main effect, F (1, 68) = 57.68, p <.001, η p 2 = .459, and interacted with electrode, F (24, 1632) = 30.14, p <.001, η p 2 = .307, ε = .196.

The variance in allele sizes ( Vp ) is relatively variable among population groups, especially so for the Frequency dataset ( Figure 2A ), and the differences for this last dataset are indeed highly significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, P<0.001 ).

In 10 and 14 Gy animal groups, highly significant (p<0.001) body temperature decreases from 35 (± 3)°C to 28 (± 2)°C (20%) and to 22 (± 4)°C (40%) were observed 2 and 4 days, respectively, prior to death or euthanasia ( Fig 3C and 3D ).

In particular, the safety spacing factor and acceleration behavior factor reach a highly significant level (P < 0.001), revealing distinct differences in driving risk perception among drivers with different driving styles.

The results indicate the same highly significant (P<0.001) accumulation of Th1 cells as found in the short term homing assay.

Regarding the frequency of use of facilities, the results show that commercial, community services and cultural facilities are associated with active ageing and exhibit a positive trend, with higher frequency of use corresponding to higher active ageing scores ( p < 0.001), as shown in Table 2 .

The Survey Day variable was highly significant ( p <0.001, edf values of 8.20 and 7.59 for MARU 1 and MARU 2, respectively) for both MARUs, with multi-modal seasonal distributions; there was also significant diel variation ( p <0.01, edf values of 3.15 and 3.64 for MARU 1 and MARU 2, respectively) for both MARUs, with peak singing activity during the night (see Figure S3 , for estimated smoothers for Survey Day and Hour).

For a set of oocytes from a single frog, sustained inward current after washout of AM546 for K69C expressing oocytes averaged −129±13 nA (N = 9), which was a highly significant increase (p<.001, Paired T-test, final vs. initial holding current).

We observed a highly significant reduction of evoked EPSCs in burst firing neurons (to 45±6% of baseline levels, p<0.001; control: 374±21 pA vs.

The GWASdb provides information of genetic variants except for that annotated in the NHGRI GWAS Catalog and manually curated the SNPs that are marginally significant ( P < 1.0 × 10 −3 ), collected from supplementary materials of each original publication.

The mean values of the two sessions (calculated as intercept in the robust regression in Fig 4 ) showed highly significant test-retest correlations of 0.93, 0.80, and 0.73 (p < 0.001) for heterophoria, subjective and objective fixation disparity, respectively.

There was a highly significant effect of genotype on tolerance, as indicated (***, p<0.001), and also of pre-exposure duration, as well as a significant interaction between genotype and pre-exposure duration (two-way ANOVA; n = 4 (30 min and 50 min pre-exposure) or 8 (40 min pre-exposure).

Conversely, after 48 hours, a highly significant increase in absorbance is detected for Asclepios in comparison with the clones NCSC2 to 6 (p<0,001; repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Tuckey post-test), reflecting an elevated number of cells in the wells and a higher proliferation rate in an interval of 48 hours. 7.

melanogaster genotype was a highly significant predictor of ovariole number (Levene’s test, F 13, 266 = 2.7702, p = 0.001).

Weight was used as a proxy for body size and showed a highly significant correlation with length (r = 0.98; p<0.001).

When compared with a simple correlation of the transformed percentages, the correlation was highly significant ( Fig 8B ; F = 95.4, P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.68).

On the basis of the additive model, the effect of normalized leaf position was highly significant, and normalized leaf area was well explained ( r 2 = 0.792, p <0.001) ( Fig. 3 ).

For each cementation solution concentration, correlation analyses were based on n = 15 independent samples (five heavy metal concentration levels × three replicates), and the strong correlations (|r| > 0.8) were highly significant (p < 0.001).

Except for k = 1 and k = 1.25 the error of both methods shows a significant ( p < 0.05), for most values of k even highly significant ( p < 0.001) difference.

For these three families, the power model was the best, with the model parameters being highly significant in each case ( p < 0.001).