This led to highly significant differences of the effect of the Bt toxin crossed into the different genetic backgrounds, which is reflected in the statistical analyses ( F = 27.913; df = 8; P < 0.01).
Excerpts
The odds ratio for 28 day survival among patients receiving colistin/carbapenem regimens was highly significant (OR = 7.88, p = 0.01), but the associated confidence interval was wide due to our relatively small sample sizes.
Even after 60 s plasma exposure, a highly significant decline ( p <0.01) in colony survival fraction up to 0.2, 0.52 and 0.68, respectively was detected in T98G, KB and HEK293 cells.
Note, however, that we did find a highly significant improvement in performance after the break (block 5 vs. post-break block: F(1,19) = 10.74, p < .01, η p 2 = .36), suggesting that performance before the break may nevertheless have been suboptimal.
For sleep parameters (see Table 4 ), differences between the null models and the main and interaction models proved to be insignificant for quality, χ 2 (6) = 2.15, p = .906, and highly significant for duration, χ 2 (6) = 18.61, p < .01), and onset latency, χ 2 (6) = 36.28, p < .001.
As shown in Table 3 , soil chemical properties had significant effects on soil bacterial community structure, with pH (P = 0.003), AN (P = 0.003), AP (P = 0.004) and SOM (P = 0.009) having highly significant effects (P < 0.01) on the bacterial community composition in the soil, and TN (P = 0.013) had a significant effect (P < 0.05) on the composition of the soil bacterial community.
The coefficient (−0.60) of the error correction term E C T t − 1 is negative and highly significant (p < 0.01) ( Table 5 ).
Furthermore, the Pearson Chi-square statistic for goodness-of-fit was 182.342, also highly significant (p < 0.01), providing strong evidence that the model has a good fit to the observed data and demonstrates adequate explanatory power.
Moreover, we have recorded the highly significant correlation (r 2 = 0.83, p < 0.01) of both genes relative transcript abundances ( S4 Table ).
The data in Table 7 indicate that the effects of B , H , BC , BH , CH , B 2 , C 2 , and H 2 on slump error are highly significant (P < 0.01), while the effect of C on slump error is not significant (P > 0.05).
Organic carbon contents within soil aggregates OC contents within soil aggregates showed highly significant differences (p ≤ 0.01) among conditions studied at depth and size-aggregates level ( Fig 3 ).
failed to reach significancep = 0.010
However, the comparison between those with a secondary level qualification and those with a higher qualification failed to reach significance; U(551,68) = 15674.0, p = 0.010). 4.
All the 7 linked markers in two QTL in the LGs A2 (OW-A2 and OQ-A2) and C9 (OY-C9 and OQ-C9) had significant (P<0.05) or extremely significant (P<0.01) difference except GSSR161 in OQ-A2 and SF24724 in OY-C9 and OQ-C9.
Furthermore, all classes showed highly significant correlations between parameter a and TY (c = 0.99, r = 0.99, and P <0.01 for SC I; c = 0.99, r = 0.99, and P <0.001 for SC II; c = 0.99, r = 0.99, and P <0.001 for SC III).
Intra-cluster correlations (Pearson r or Spearman Rho with a non-parametric distribution in the scatter plot) were all highly significant with p < .01.
After transplantation, there was a highly significant reduction of kidney longitudinal diameters from 20.08 ± 5.12 cm to 17.48 ± 5.12 cm ( P <0.01), with a mean rate of reduction of 13.34 ± 18.10%.
All models reported here are highly significant (p<0.01), and the explained variance is between 69% and 83%.
Educational heterogeneity (Column 2): The DFI × High Education interaction is large and highly significant ( β =0.008, SE = 0.002, p < 0.01), showing that farmers with ≥9 years of schooling (junior high completion) benefit 80% more from DFI than farmers with <9 years.
At the 95% probability level, the results showed that the fertilizer concentration and sediment concentration of the type-H 1 drip irrigation tape reached the extremely significant level (p < 0.01).
For both approaches, CD4 intercept exhibited a highly significant association with the composite outcome in the unadjusted analysis (P <0.01) but did not show an association in the adjusted analyses.
Treatment was the primary driver of growth enhancement, showing highly significant main effects on plant height, root length, stem diameter, and fresh weight (P < 0.01 for all).
The difference in performance for the two modalities was moderately significant ( t (118) = -2.61, p = .01, BF = 4.03), with a higher performance in the haptic domain.
Results The genotype effect was highly significant (p < 0.01) for all traits analyzed, evidencing the existence of genetic variability for these traits in the studied population.
Differential expression analysis identified 150 nominally significant genes, of which three were significant at p<0.01 ( Fig 5 ).
The comparison between zones for each family revealed highly significant differences in 9 of the 11 families (P < 0.01), except for Ardeidae and Threskiornithidae, which exhibited marginal significance (P = 0.04611) and non-significance (P = 0.07295), respectively.