Excerpts

This represents a highly significant increase of 74.5% (p<0.01, Fig. 5 ).

*: Significant at P < 0.05; **: Highly significant at P < 0.01; ***: Extremely significant at P < 0.001; /: Not significant at P > 0.05.

Model 8 is a test of the positive effect of R&D internationalization on domestic technology alliances, and the promotion effect of R&D internationalization on domestic technology alliances is extremely significant ( β = 0.3603, p < 0.01).

Differences were considered statistically significant with p values<0.05 and highly significant with p<0.01 and p<0.001.

Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), ANOVA with Tukey's honest significant difference post-hoc test were applied, and differences were considered significant when P <0.05 or highly significant when P <0.01 or P <0.001.

In paraquat-treated mice, however, we saw elevated levels [of 36%] in p-GSK-3β that were highly significant [ p <0.01, Fig. 1B ].

Fixation indices that indicate genetic differentiation, including F CT (between groups), F SC (among populations within groups) and F ST (within populations) were all highly significant ( P <0.01) for the three mtDNA genes ( Table 2 ).

Data were considered highly significant if p < 0.01 or p < 0.001.

The most highly significant association was with p75 (Cohort 1, p<0.01; Cohort 2, p<0.005).

This difference is highly significant for a one-way ANOVA test ( F (1, 97) = 13.79, p < .01).

In addition, only the genes, which significantly changed at least at one time point during LR with significant difference (P≤0.05) or extremely significant difference (P≤0.01) between PH and NC groups were referred to as LR-associated genes.

Colonic permeability and electrophysiology (Ussing chambers) Colonic permeability to FD4 in basal condition displayed a highly significant interaction between maternal ATB treatment and offspring late diet (P < 0.01) ( Table 2 ).

For all of the traits, the variations due to genotypes under this study were enormously significant (p<0.01).

Mean Gt and radicle growth values of the different eucalyptus concentrations ( Fig 1 ) ranged from 82 to 30% and 90 to 33% of control, respectively, with a highly significant effect of concentration (ANOVA, P ≤ 0.01 for Gt; P ≤ 0.001 for growth).

In the fear conditioning test, hippocampal-dependent memory was assessed in a novel context and revealed highly significant impairment in the S-P group when compared to the C-P group on postoperative days 3 ( p < 0.01) and 7 ( p < 0.05) ( Fig 3A and 3B ).

Among the factors examined, the inclination angle B and its quadratic term B2 had highly significant effects ( P < 0.01), while rotational speed A and the interaction term AB showed significant influences ( P < 0.05).

A highly significant positive correlation (p < 0.01) was observed between Cr and Ni, with a correlation coefficient of 0.887.

The data in Table 7 indicate that the effects of B , H , BC , BH , CH , B 2 , C 2 , and H 2 on slump error are highly significant (P < 0.01), while the effect of C on slump error is not significant (P > 0.05).

Note, however, that we did find a highly significant improvement in performance after the break (block 5 vs. post-break block: F(1,19) = 10.74, p < .01, η p 2 = .36), suggesting that performance before the break may nevertheless have been suboptimal.

Statistically significant changes were classed as significant [*] where p<0.05, highly significant [**] where p<0.01.

The difference between both the probability and subtraction model with four CPGs and the experimental values in the mean and median IPIs, and the IPI standard deviation was highly significant (P<0.01, Kruskal-Wallis Test, followed by Dunn's Multiple Comparisons Test, Table 1 ).

Although the finding was marginally significant at the p < .01 level ( p = .0102), Hispanics with an immediate family member with cancer had higher odds of having been diagnosed with cancer.

However, compared to the CF group, the PSF group showed a reduction in microbial taxa at various taxonomic levels, with a significant decrease observed at the phylum level (p<0.05) and a highly significant decrease observed at the class level (p<0.01) ( Table 4 ).

In contrast, rHDL containing S1P had a highly significant, protective influence ex vivo , and in vivo (-50%, p<0.01).

non-survivors was highly significant, p<0.01 (actual p<0.0001).