Relative abundance of Myoviridae had a highly significant negative correlation with latitude (R = - 0.671, p < 0.0001) and a positive correlation with longitude (R = 0.484, p < 0.0001).
Excerpts
The difference in survival expectance between patients with high-risk score and low-risk score was highly significant (p<0.0001).
2 ), the mean number of circulating CD20 + B cells in the 3 treated animals (0.04±0.2 B cells/μl blood) was 1000 fold lower compared to untreated animals (393±70 B cells/μl blood) and this difference was highly significant (p<0.0001, unpaired one tail T test).
A paired t test revealed a statistically highly significant (p<0.0001) difference between lesion and reference values (t = 6.638, sample size 32).
Similar to the whole embryo, expression of Bmal1 and Per2 in embryonic liver and kidney did not show significant variation over 24 hours (P>0.05) while expression in the same tissues from adults showed highly significant variation (P<0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).
3b) , which is highly significant for CCL4 (p<0.0001, post test for linear trend).
The group treated with VP2.51 from day 1 after treatment with L-BMAA (L-BMAA + VP2.51 PT1) ( S3 Movie ) presented highly significant differences in the evolution of the neurological evaluation from the group treated only with L-BMAA (F = 89.34, p <0.0001) ( Fig 3 ).
FA had a highly significant effect on cell viability, explaining 57% of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.0001), while the effect of cort was negligible (1.7% of variance, p = 0.63).
The difference in tumour size between the LGR5 knockdown and the parental cells was highly significant (p<0.0001) at all time points, however the growth of tumours overexpressing LGR5 differed significantly from parental cells only for the first 10 days of the xenografts experiment ( Fig. 5A ).
The results in Table 7 demonstrate a highly significant difference among algorithms ( P <0.0001), substantiating the robustness of bDTOPRS in feature selection.
By 72 hours, a highly significant (p < 0.0001) significant reduction in p-AKT/AKT levels was noted across all treatment groups.
The difference in log-ratios between the acute DF with DHF patients was highly significant (p<0.0001).
Subsequent categorical testing against the other biomarkers, clinical and paraclinical parameters still showed highly significant relations between CXCL13, MMP-9 and CXCL10 (p<0.0001 for all) and between CXCL13, MMP-9 and all CSF MS-risk parameters (p<0.0001 for all).
In each subject large off–axis placement of the laser beam caused a highly significant (p < 0.0001) RNFL thickness measurement artifacts in almost all sectors.
This difference was highly significant using a two-tailed t-test 22 df, assuming unequal variance (P<0.0001).
When tumor burden (cell number) was plotted against serum S100A6 protein concentration in these animals, results indicated a highly significant correlation (r = 0.79, p<0.0001); serum S100A6 concentration was greater as the tumor burden increased over time for animals given SKOV-3-Luc ( Figure 6C ).
The analysis reveals a highly significant correlation between the two methods (Pearson's coefficient of correlation = −0.5614, 95% upper limit = −0.4558, 95% lower limit = −0.5614, p<0.0001) that supports the use of normalized 454 counts as a measure of relative gene expression across groups.
This co-infection was highly significant, despite the co-clustering of M. mitochondrii genotype A in OTU Midichloria 1 with genotype B ( p <0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).
A logistic linear model confirmed a highly significant effect of the treatment and genotype on the phenotypic sex, but not for the interaction term (treatment: p<0.0001; genotype: p<0.0025).
Contrary to the negative correlation, a highly significant positive correlation (p<0.0001) found in these analyses.
The regression models were both found to be highly significant (p < 0.0001), while the values for lack of fit values were not significant (p > 0.05), confirming the model fitness to produce predictions for optimal hydrolysis conditions.
In each subject the proportion of variance explained was superior in the non-shuffled data and this difference was highly significant (Wilcoxon signed rank test, all p values <.0001).
There was a highly significant difference in the distributions of lead concentrations among the seven bird species (likelihood-ratio test, χ 2 (12) = 132.66, P <0.0001), but this difference was due entirely to inclusion of chicken in the group of species sampled.
Dropping out and psychological consultation due to burnout showed highly significant associations with all burnout dimensions (p < 0.0001).
Comparison between the maximum ratio observed in control and mutant animals showed that this difference in cyt/nuc ratio was statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001)( Fig 3F ).