Excerpts

Results and Discussion Pheidole worker subcastes, age groups, and species have distinct brain architectures Multivariate discriminant analysis revealed highly significant gross neuroanatomical differentiation among our 12 worker groups (Wilks' Λ = 4×10 −4 , p <0.0001).

The ANOSIM yielded a highly significant difference in the chemical patterns of the two groups ( ANOSIM : r = 0.9, p = 0.0001).

By an adaption of the binomial test this level of success was highly significant (p<0.0001).

This unequal distribution of HBV genotypes in the archipelago was extremely significant (two-sided P value < 0.0001) ( Table 1 ).

Both the treatment and center effects for k 1 were highly significant ( p <0.0001).

FT wAUROC was also highly significant in 141 patients with diabetes 0.80 (0.78–0.82; P<0.0001).

aegypti genes are without introns compared to 33% of the EZGs, and this difference is highly significant (P<0.0001).

Furthermore, the highly significant inverse correlation between expression of Glut-1 (implying local hypoxia) and the presence of micro vessels suggests that hypoxia is a major driver (p<0.0001; Figure 1A ).

Firstly, the association with poor physical health was very high in men (OR 4.08 (without T2D) and 11.34 (with T2D)) and women (OR 3.39 (without T2D) and 5.05 (with T2D)), with both associations highly significant ( P <0.0001).

During perifusion of both the whole spinal cord and the cervico-trigeminal area, the interaction between the two factors of variation was found to be highly significant indeed (F 1-27 = 24.33 and F 1-22 = 30.17, respectively, p<0.0001; Table S1 ).

Of the four SNPs with significant or borderline significant IL-2 associations in the whole blood assay, only rs10507173 was associated with CD4+ IL-2 production ( p <0.0001, general linearized model), though the association was driven by a single minor allele homozygote outlier (2H) and was not significant under a dominant model ( p = 0.95).

Relative to central hospitals, patients at hospitals in the most peripheral quartile had significantly higher odds of death, but patients at hospitals in quartile 2 were no different from the reference, and those in quartile 3 were borderline significant for reduced mortality (OR (95% CI): Q1 2.10 (1.76–2.51), p<0.0001; Q2 1.00 (0.87–1.15), p = 0.997; Q3 0.89 (0.79–1.00), p = 0.050; Q4 (reference)).

Contrary to the negative correlation, a highly significant positive correlation (p<0.0001) found in these analyses.

These values were greater than zero for both ACT (Mean = 77.18 μV; t (17) = 6.88, p<10 −7 ) and PASS (Mean = 32.04 μV; t (17) = 3.25, p<0.002), and the difference between ACT and PASS was highly significant (t (17) = 5.5, p<10 −4 ).

The main effect of DAT GENOTYPE was highly significant (F [2] , [81] = 14.9, p<0.0001).

As expected, there were highly significant differences among the three regional comparisons (Friedman ANOVA: χ 2 2df = 77.82; p <0.0001).

The type of basal medium was also highly significant (F Value = 67; p<0.0001), though much less so than PGR, with more shoots regenerated on MS medium than WPM.

The results are highly significant (p<0.0001, Table 2 ), and indicate that MYC IHC can identify a set of tumors with transcriptional profiles resembling those previously categorized as mBL.

spiralis , respectively), and were highly significant in all cases ( P <0.0001).

The main effect of the three games on the mean MAO (not including DG in which the recipient did not have the rejection option) was highly significant ( F (2, 240) = 51.71, p < .0001, η 2 = .301).

All groups, except angiosarcoma (p value = 0.386), retained a highly significant increase of serum DR6 compared to normal controls (p values<.0001–0.0044).

FA had a highly significant effect on cell viability, explaining 57% of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.0001), while the effect of cort was negligible (1.7% of variance, p = 0.63).

The resulting linear regression equation, optimized for Amemiya Prediction Criterion, is highly significant (correlation coefficient = 0.787, r - 2 = 0.606 , P<0.0001, α = 0.05, see Fig 14 ).

Highly significant relationships were identified for both parameters ( P <.0001).

These regressions persisted when adjusting for age, UPDRS III or LEDD in a multivariable regression analysis, as time from diagnosis remained a highly significant negative predictor of CSL (R = 0.66; slope ß = -0.029; p < 0.0001) and a positive predictor of CCAD (R = 0.57; slope ß = 0.033; p = 0.0002), while age (CSL, slope ß = 0.003; p = 0.63; CCAD, slope ß = 0.001; p = 0.94), UPDRS III (CSL, slope ß = 0.32; p = 0.09) or LEDD (CSL, slope ß = 0.23; p = 0.22) were not predictors.