Excerpts

The changes in ExitLOS and HistLOS are highly significant (P < 0.0001) but in opposite directions.

This level of therapeutic efficacy was highly significant, with a Fisher’s exact test 95% CI range of 79.7–99.9% (p<0.0001).

The FT-B1 alleles showed highly significant differences in heading time ( P< 0.0001) within both alleles of FT-A1 , but the differences between the adjusted means of the FT-B1 alleles were 34% larger in the lines homozygous for the mutant ft-A1 allele (25.0 day delay in flowering) than in the lines homozygous or heterozygous for the wild type FT-A1 allele (18.6 day delay).

domesticus sub-species ( Table S2 ) based on highly significant discrimination of the modern sympatric species (MANOVA, Wilk’s Lambda = 0.087, df1 = 13, df2 = 26, F = 20.78, P <0.0001).

Survival analysis revealed highly significant differences in mortality rates between the two strains of I . fumosorosea (Wilcoxon test, χ 2 = 21.85, P < 0.0001; log-rank test, χ 2 = 27.97, P < 0.0001).

Independent repetition of the cross confirmed this finding; statistical analysis revealed that the result is highly significant (P value <0.0001 by the Pearson’s chi-squared test).

In GLMs with male intensity as dependent variable, and female intensity, chromosome type (Z or autosomal) and the interaction term as independent variables, the interaction term was highly significant (zebra finch: p<0.0001, Table 1 ; common whitethroat: p<0.0001, Table 2 ).

Across clutches, the mean incidence of FTT was 19.5 + 4.99% of hatchlings, but the range varied from 0% to 53.3%, demonstrating highly significant clutch effects ( X 2 = 48.36, df = 11, P <0.0001; Table 4 ).

The results reveal a highly significant positive correlation between flower size and head diameter at the basal, middle and apical zone of the head (r 2 = 0.56, P< 0.0001).

Pelicans showed a trend (r 2 = 0.41, P<0.0001) toward earlier arrival between 1965 and 2008, with arrival dates advancing approximately 16 days ( Fig. 2 ; 21 April in 1965 vs. 5 April in 2008).

Prevalence among HC accounted for only 7% and the results were highly significant ( p <0.0001; Fig 1B ).

We found highly significant positive correlations between the identity levels of allergens and the representative helminth (r = 0.70, P<0.0001), protozoan (r = 0.64, P<0.0001) and fungal (r = 0.47, P = 0.0011) organisms suggesting that a conserved protein allergen in HPF is also conserved to a similar level in human.

Highly significant relationships were identified for both parameters ( P <.0001).

An increasing trend was observed for overall TDR when comparing 2000–2005 (6.0%) and 2006–2015 (8.2%) (p<0.0001), which was associated with significant NNRTI TDR increase (p<0.0001).

The inclusion of carapace width (body size) in a multiple regression model along with the OLS residuals (which remained highly significant– b = 1.17; P <0.0001) also significantly and positively explained bridging speed ( b = 1.05; P = 0.005).

For all immunological outcomes, the interaction term between groups*visits were highly significant (p<0.0001); suggesting significant variation in antibody kinetics between groups.

To determine if the effect of FMR4 on cell proliferation is reproducible in other human cell lines we carried out a similar experiment using HeLa cells and found that all three siRNAs against FMR4 also resulted in highly significant decreases in cell proliferation in comparison to control siRNA (P<0.0001) ( Figure 6B ).

= 0.414 and was found to be significant with a p value = 0.0139, while the haplotype GA which included the risk allele for rs9275572 was also highly significant (p<0.0001 and freq. = 0.245).

The difference in RWL between the 2 groups was highly significant (T-test: p<0.0001).

As presented in Table 2 and shown in Fig 2a , our results show a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) between fixation counts on items that were answered incorrectly (29.07±21.71) and and those that were solved correctly (17.16±13.89).

This change was highly significant, as indicated by one-way ANOVA analysis (p<0.0001).

Highly significant correlations generally exist between the various markers (p<0.0001), with a slightly lesser significance between MLANA and MITF (p = 0.005), with the exception being between MLANA and TYR markers, where no statistical significance was found (p = 0.11).

These differences were highly significant at the 2-hour time point for both combinations (p < 0.0001).

The difference between the distribution of both normal and degraded mitochondria and dinoflagellates in control and heat-treated anemones were highly significant in all 6 scenarios (χ 2 (1) values not shown for each comparison, but all P>0.0001; Figure 6 ).

Nevertheless, the correlation for the change in diet soda vs the change in regular soda was highly significant, r = -0.67, P = 0001.