Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed highly significant ( P <0.0001) genetic and environmental effects for tocopherol content and composition.
Excerpts
Analysis of the cortico-endosteal surfaces showed a highly significant reduction in osteoblast number in vehicle treated tumour-bearing mice compared to naïve mice (0.1±0.3 and 41.7±8.6 respectively, p<0.0001, Fig 6B ).
( Table 3 ) An older age was a highly significant positive factor for abstinence (p<0.0001).
Pair-wise permutation tests comparing predicted species richness between the entire small mammal assemblage, native species forest assemblage, and forest-specialist assemblage for the Atlantic Forest of Paraguay were highly significant ( P < 0.0001; Fig 2 ).
Differences between the MP cladogram and the raw material model tree were found to be highly significant (p<0.0001).
By two-tailed t-test, all markers exhibited highly significant (P<0.0001) decrements in immunoreactivity in the AD twin compared to the ND twin ( Figure 2b ).
Three days following sepsis the two models had an inverse correlation that was highly significant (p<0.0001) with an r = −0.284 ( Figure 4C ).
The effects of the study drugs on gut microbiome β-diversity at the OTU level were first tested statistically using a two-way NPMANOVA and the results revealed highly significant main effects for drug (F 4,65 = 3.35; p = 0.0001) and time (F 2,65 = 8.43, p = 0.0001), as well as a significant interaction (F 8,65 = 1.77, p = 0.0001).
The correlation coefficient between LCT*P frequencies and latitude was highly significant ( r = 0.274, p <0.0001).
The increases over time were highly significant for the seronegative and intermediate baseline groups (p<0.0001, p = 0.0026, respectively) but not for the initially high baseline group (p = 0.23).
All three models were highly significant, confirming the robustness of the classifier method ( P = 0.0001, P = 0.0002, and P = 0.0003, for 3-, 4- and 5- nearest neighbours models, respectively.
ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of condition. with maximum in the lower gamma range at 30–45 Hz (p<0.0001, Fig. 3 ).
All data were derived from at least eight independent experiments and the reported differences are statistically highly significant compared to the values obtained for the MEM-control (p<0.0001 for all cases using two-tailed unpaired Students-t-test and Mann-Whitney-test).
Once again, by restricting our analysis to the C/C1 overlap, we find a highly significant difference in overlap between saline and epibatidine treated [32.60 ± 5.32% (SEM); p < 0.0001].
In the case of the non-sensitive membrane proteins, the motif was found only in 5 out of 143 sequences demonstrating a highly significant correlation between the presence of the motif in an SAS and its cotransin sensitivity (p value < 0.0001 according to Fisher ́s exact test) [ 21 ].
ANOVA on the proportion of nymphs that settled and presumably fed on each site (midrib or secondary veins, on upper or lower sides of the leaf) indicated that differences between healthy and LAS-infected leaves were not significant ( F = 0.02, df = 1248, P = 0.88), whereas those among various sites were highly significant ( F = 25.7, df = 3248, P <0.0001).
Due to the large number of data sets in each population, both correlations were highly significant (p<0.0001), though data points are not fully independent.
As expected, a negative trend between both variables is evident in the two groups ( Fig. 4b ), with individual seed mass decreasing linearly with increasing fruit seediness ( F = 126.0, P <0.0001, d.f. = 3, 87).
spiralis , respectively), and were highly significant in all cases ( P <0.0001).
Both F ST (0.172) and Φ PT (0.254) statistics revealed the presence of highly significant genetic differences among sites (P <0.0001 and P <0.001 respectively) ( Table 2 ); as expected, Φ PT values exceeded those of F ST .
Relative abundance of Myoviridae had a highly significant negative correlation with latitude (R = - 0.671, p < 0.0001) and a positive correlation with longitude (R = 0.484, p < 0.0001).
4 , with the highly significant difference in the number of cells expressing MAGE C1 in the CD19 + vs CD27 + cell populations ( p -value<0.0001) ( Fig. 4 ).
In a separate model of the group of secondary auditory sites, in contrast, these factors are highly significant ( t = 7.17; p< 0.0001, and t = 3.89; p = 0.0002, respectively), showing that in secondary auditory areas such modulation is call-specific.
This was highly significant ( p <0.0001).
This difference is highly significant for both DZr and MZr (P<0,0001 for both comparisons).