borderline significancep < 0.10
We also report on main effects with borderline significance ( p < 0.10) to show trends that may additionally help pattern recognition of a brain-hemostasis cross-talk.
We also report on main effects with borderline significance ( p < 0.10) to show trends that may additionally help pattern recognition of a brain-hemostasis cross-talk.
In NMOSD we found VEP latency increasing 0.24 ± 0.07 ms for every year of age (p < 0.001, GEE), while relationship with disease duration, controlling for patient age, showed a trend for significance (+0.28 ± 0.17 ms per year, p = 0.10); no significant role for fellow eye ON status was found (p = 0.29).
4a ), being significant for Eif2b3 and showing a statistical trend (p < 0.1) for the other three: Med28 , Pias1 and Sirt1 (Mann-Whitney U test).
A statistical significance between comparisons was defined when P ≤ 0.05 and a statistical trend was defined as 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.
2 C); Blood glucose exhibited a decreasing trend ( p < 0.1) upon RS administration (90.7 ± 8.3 mg/dL at 0 week vs. 86.2 ± 6.0 mg/dL at 2 weeks in the RS group; Fig. 2 D), which was in accordance with that of the results with mouse experiment (Fig. 1 D).
Variables that showed a trend towards significance (p < 0.1) in the univariable regression were then added to a step-down multivariable logistic regression model to determine independent predictors of ICH.
Effects of low doses of GOP showed a slight trend on IL-6 compared to control ( p < 0.10).
For predictive factors that were marginally significant ( P < 0.1), we calculated the ORs and 95% CIs in multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses.
The results of the model revealed a marginally significant interaction between Time and Group, b = 0.3, t (12) = 1.29, p = 0.1.
Statistically significant p-values are shown in bold and underlined when they are below 0.05 or only in bold if a trend toward significance is observed (0.05 ≤ p < 0.1).
For men, the two-way interaction term (depressive symptoms × brokerage) predicting adjusted left hippocampal volume was marginally significant ( p = 0.10).
In the distal colon content samples, the OTUs displayed a decreasing trend (0.05 ≤ P < 0.10) and Chao1 and ACE were significantly decreased ( P < 0.05) with pregnancy stage.
P values of < 0.05 were considered significant ( P < 0.001 presented as **, 0.001 ≤ P < 0.05 as *), 0.05 ≤ P < 0.1 as marginally significant (presented as #) and P ≥ 0.1 as nonsignificant (presented as ns).
The significance level was set at P < 0.05 and t indicated a statistical trend (0.05 < P < 0.10).
Thus, the correlation is significant and marginally significant (i.e. 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10) at these two site.
With the dependent variable life evaluation, competence only showed a trend towards significance ( p < 0.10).
No patient had a significant local effect, one patient showed a trend of a local effect (0.05 < p < 0.1; MCS patient #13) and did not regain consciousness.
Finally, and in contrast to the correlations, knowledge of risk factors and signs and symptoms was not associated with BSE frequency, although the knowledge of risk factors approached significance ( B = 0.06, p < .10).
Contrasts were considered significant when P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant when 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.
Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05, and a trend towards significance was shown when p < 0.1.
Significance was defined as P < 0.05, and a trend toward significance as 0.05 < P < 0.10.
Specifically, RBC: mem was positively correlated with EF ( ρ = 0.67, p = 0.03) and showed a trend with total cognitive composite score ( ρ = 0.55, p = 0.10).
All parameters showing a statistical trend ( p < 0.1) were included in a multivariate model to identify parameters independently associated with elevated cerebral blood flow.
For the cropland site, a fairly significant negative partial correlation was observed for EWUE with solar radiation (– 0.451, p < 0.1; Table 5 ).
Risk factors were first explored using a univariate analysis; those which showed at least a marginally significant association ( P < 0.1) were then considered as candidates for a subsequent forward stepwise multivariate logistic regression.