These were highly significant using Mantel's test ( P < 0.001).
Excerpts
Regression analysis revealed a highly significant correlation between δ 13 C in modern Sphagnum and the present WT depth ( R 2 = 0.67, p < 0.001, Fig.
The mean difference was − 2.87 (95% CI: -3.76 to -1.98), also highly significant ( p < 0.001).
4 , the association between SHR and mortality remains highly significant (1.90 (1.65–2.19), P < 0.001).
The antagonistic activity across all three assays (Dual Culture, Non-Volatile, and Volatile) was subjected to one-way ANOVA , which confirmed a highly significant difference in the susceptibility among the tested plant pathogenic fungi ( P < 0.001).
Vegetative—leaf parameters Highly significant differences existed ( P < 0.001) using the selected distances (0.55–0.85) to image the leaves of the pepper genotypes (Supplementary Table S1 ).
Similarly, targeted NPs treated group also showed extremely significant (p < 0.001) lower number of errors as compared to other groups and was almost similar to control group (Fig. 4A ).
Worth noting is that PPC5 revealed a highly significant increase in HR in the left DLPFC at 20–40 s post consumption (D3–S4, Tstat = 4.2, p < 0.001; D3-S8, Tstat = 4.0, p < 0.001) in the same area as the TA 0–20 s response (left DLPFC), but with an opposite effect.
There was also a very highly significant difference between the two measurement periods ( p < 0.001).
Differences in dominant frequency were highly significant among the four analyzed species (F3,80 = 792.71, p < 0.001).
Furthermore, the interaction between nuclease and nucleic acid type was also highly significant (p < 0.001) with TALENs and DNA being the most efficient combination ( Fig.
In the 7 DAI, a highly significant abundance of GA 12 was observed in the laser-irradiated seeds than control with a fold change of 0.13 (*** p < 0.001) and found consistently higher in the irradiated seeds with a fold change of 0.10,0.13 and 0.03 respectively (* p < 0.05) (Fig. 6 c) in 14–28 DAI.
Since there was a highly significant difference in prevalence of D. repens between sled dogs (four-fold higher) and other dogs (mainly pets; dog status × D. repens infection: χ 2 1 = 23.0, P < 0.001; Table 1 ), this also contributed to the lower overall prevalence in 2019.
A highly significant association was observed between mGPS and nutritional status ( p < 0.001) (Table 3 ).
The hospitalization rate for elective general surgeries has its initial level at 15.184 per 100,000 inhabitants (95% CI 14.725 to 15.643; p < 0.001), with a positive trend of 0.038 per 100,000 inhabitants per month (95% CI 0.030 to 0.045; p < 0.001).
ESEM-EDS and ANOVA results confirm highly significant colonization effect due the second inoculant A26 or AF TN treatment under drought ( F -ratio 290, 326, p < 0.001 respectively), salt ( F -ratio 281, 299, p < 0.001 respectively) and pathogen stress ( F -ratio 290, 292, p < 0.001 respectively) (Table S2 , Figs 7 , 8 and 9 ).
The AMMI model showed that the mean square of the first principal component was highly significant (p ≤ 0.001) and the second principal component axis (p ≤ 0.05) but the third principal component axis (IPCA3) was not significant ( p > 0.05).
Results Genetic and multivariate variation among families The combined analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001 ) among families for all measured traits (Table 1 ), confirming substantial genetic variability within the Pusa Srijan-derived population.
ANOSIM indicated that differences in the prey spectra between the three species were highly significant at prey family-level (R = 0.784, P < 0.001) but non-significant at the level of order (R = 0.079, P = 0.063).
The results reveal a highly significant effect of filler loading on all measured properties, including tensile strength (F = 72.58, p < 0.001), Young’s modulus (F = 107.35, p < 0.001), strain at rupture (F = 272.20, p < 0.001), and toughness (F = 312.98, p < 0.001).
However, paired analysis within each group showed a highly significant reduction in SBP, DBP, MAP, and HR after treatment compared to baseline (paired P value < 0.001), indicating that both drugs were equally effective in lowering blood pressure and HR.
Comparing patients based on sarcopenia according to the above-mentioned classification revealed a highly significant difference in median OS of 34.5 vs. 10.3 months ( p < 0.001) but no significant difference according to cPFS (27.7 vs. 16.3 months, p = 0.354) or sPFS (17 vs. 8 months, p = 0.35).
Further, DMI showed a highly significant correlation ( P < 0.001) with ADG (r = 0.65), initial BW (r = 0.68), final BW (r = 0.82) and MBW (r = 0.77), and moderate correlation ( P < 0.001) with FCR (r = 0.54).
There was a highly significant correlation between Digit RAN and reading fluency (r = −0.782, P < 0.001; Fig. 1b ).
PERMANOVA revealed a highly significant difference in the composition of the four major food types between the BEH and MIC estimates (pseudo-F1,22 = 42.09, P = 0.001), with method explaining 51.3% of total variance in dietary composition (R2 = 0.513).