Excerpts

A one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of classifier type on accuracy in the Delta band, F(5, 24) = 184.79, p < .001, η2 = 0.97, indicating a large effect size.

6 A) confirmed a highly significant main effect of concentration on cell viability (F (1, 60) = 187.05, p < 0.001) and a significant formulation–concentration interaction (F (5, 60) = 3.35, p = 0.0097), indicating non-parallel dose–response curves and justifying direct pairwise comparisons at each concentration.

Moderately to highly significant inconsistency (I 2 > 50%, P < 0.001) was found in all proportion analyses (86.4%, 74.9%, 73.8%, and 91.6%, for AIC, LB, ALG, and ALP, respectively).

All sequential improvements are highly significant (p < 0.001, McNemar’s test), confirming that gains from class balancing, eGFR regression, and monotonicity enforcement are not due to chance.

A p -value < 0.05* was deemed statistically significant, a p-value < 0.01** was considered highly significant, a p-value < 0.001*** was denoted as extremely significant, and a p-value < 0.001**** was denoted as exceptionally significant while 'ns' indicated non-significance.

Further, the number of sickle-shaped blood vessels was associated with distant metastasis and OS, with a significant trend toward a poor prognosis (metastasis P < 0.001, Cox; OS P < 0.001, Cox) observed for patients with more than 100 such vessels in large maximal tumor sections.

The SUVs of sub-centimeter fludeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid pulmonary nodules with Q.Clear illustrated highly significant differences from those reconstructed with other algorithms (P < 0.001).

Cleaning frequency also shows a highly significant negative effect ( p < 0.001), indicating the reduction in current with increasing days between cleaning.

Using the ANOVA test, we find a highly significant expression level difference (p < 0.001) in the zt1 expression with respect to the rest of genotypes.

We also observed a highly significant reduction (30% compared to controls p < 0.001) in the ability of hearing impaired individual’s ability to detect cooling which was not accompanied by changes in warm detection.

Among the 13 distinct features selected, four features (LM-W LHL -G-MaxProb-T2, TM-W LHL -G-MaxProb-T2, LM-W HLL - G-MaxProb-T2, E-W HLH -H-Max-T2) were statistically extremely significant (p-value < 0.001), seven features (E-W HHL -H-Max_T2, T-H-Min-T2, TM-W HLH -H-Min-T1, E-MedianLBP-T1, T-MedianLBP-T1, E-W HLH -H-MeanAbsDev-T2, TM-GE-Convexity-T1) were statistically highly significant (p-value < 0.01), and two features (TM-W HLH -H-Min-T2, LM-W HLL -H-Range-T2) were statistically significant (p-value < 0.05), between the LC versus LF outcomes.

Crucially, all three behavioral factors were highly significant predictors of DBM: Professional Role and Self-Regulation: (B = 0.124,β = 0.456,t(231) = 9.869, p <.001), Emotional and Social Dynamics: (B = 0.098,β = 0.359,t(231) = 7.164, p <.001), and Skills and Belief Systems : (B = − 0.117,β=−0.431,t(231) = −8.178, p <.001).

The relationship between urban soil OC density (beneath both impervious surfaces and greenspace) and depth was described by a highly significant negative exponential function ( R 2 = 57%, F (1, 184) = 243.8, p <0.001, y = 51.910(±2.492 S.E.)e −0.0232 (± 0.002 S.E.)× ) ( Fig. 1 ).

There was a highly significant and positive correlation between ambient dose rate and total individual absorbed dose rate (χ 2 (1,226) = 15.21, p < 0.001, Estimate = 0.187; conditional R 2 = 0.95; marginal R 2 = 0.07; Fig. 4 ).

There was a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in knowledge by location.

However, the control group reached peak edema in the distal skin tissue layer within 6 h postoperatively, with a highly significant difference compared to the sham group ( P < 0.001).

The ANOVA for NIHSS scores (Table 5 ) revealed highly significant main effects of Time (MS = 1852, F(3, 48) = 676.9, ηp2 = 0.96, p < 0.001) and Group (MS = 2175, F(1, 50) = 169.2, ηp2 = 0.77, p < 0.001), as well as a significant Time × Group interaction (MS = 424, F(3, 48) = 155.2, ηp2 = 0.76, p < 0.001).

Accordingly, a highly significant difference was observed between the amount of energy imported and exported by birds during the study period (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001).

The positive slope for the latitude became highly significant when the bootstrap test for the regression slopes was applied using the 10,000 bootstrap samples (recruitment date: p < 0.001; latitude: p = 0.003).

The results show that all three models were highly significant ( p < 0.001), confirming that the response process parameters had a substantial effect on extraction efficiency.

On ASVAR the test reveals a highly significant effect of task type ( F(2,\,15) = 274.0 , p < 0.001 ): forgery detection ( , σ = 0.24 ), biometric identification ( , σ = 0.30 ), and forgery source identification ( , σ = 0.24 ) are mutually and significantly separated (all pairwise t -tests: p < 0.001 ).

In regard to survival probability of embryos derived from sexed-sperm, a highly significant individual sire effect was found on embryo survival time (Cox proportional hazards regression, p < 0.001, Fig. 2C ) highlighting that the survival time of embryos after sex sorting is bull-specific.

The mixed ANOVA conducted on the N450 time window, revealed a highly significant main effect of Condition ( F (1, 45) = 39.71, p < 0.001) with a large effect size ( η 2 = 0.468), indicating larger amplitude for INHIB than INIT trials, and a significant main effect of Group ( F (1, 45) = 4.87, p < 0.05), with smaller effect size ( η 2 = 0.097), consisting of larger N450 amplitude for CTL than DEP participants.

Conversely, the regression modeling for the TT model exhibited the best fit at a 0 MPa water potential of 0 MPa and a highly significant ( p < 0.001) R 2 = 0.939 after 4 h but displayed a non-significant ( p > 0.05) lowest fit (R 2 = 0.163) at a water potential of -6.0 MPa after 2 h (Fig. 7 ).

The AMMI model showed that the mean square of the first principal component was highly significant (p ≤ 0.001) and the second principal component axis (p ≤ 0.05) but the third principal component axis (IPCA3) was not significant ( p > 0.05).