Quadratic trend analysis indicated that the SLD initially increased slightly but gradually exhibited a decreasing trend over time ( p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.751, Table 4 , Figure 4 ).
Excerpts
Uterus Weight The effect of ovariectomy on uterus weight was highly significant ( P < 0.001), whereas vibration had no effect ( P > 0.05).
52.62) and this finding was highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 3 ].
Similarly, studies that implemented participant condition blinding and experimenter blinding of condition, suggestibility level and nocebo response ( k = 7) demonstrated a larger and highly significant effect size, Z r = .37 [.16, .58], Z = 3.46, p < .001, equivalent to r = .35, with only a minor decrease in heterogeneity, I 2 = 76% and τ 2 = .05.
After removing the 'nil by mouth' samples from the statistical analysis, there were highly significant differences in the distribution of isolates between feeding regimes (chi-square = 94.95, 28DF, P < 0.001).
Highly significant differences were found in the amount of debris extruded among all the groups (P<0.001).
Their co-occurrence matched random assembly process expectations, but presence of the single ectocommensal species had a highly significant negative effect on recruitment of all burrow-wall commensal species ( P < 0.001), including on its burrow-wall commensal sister species ( P < 0.001).
The results of the multiple regression hierarchy showed that the joint impact of gender and age with regards to being healthy or unhealthy only explained 2.7% of the total variance (adjusted R2), although the equation is clearly significant (F 2,320 = 96.3, p < 0.001).
Statistical analyses showed that strain type had a highly significant impact on hydrophobicity ( p < 0.001), while left versus right contact angles did not significantly differ ( p > 0.05).
Kruskal–Wallis analysis revealed highly significant differences among the three groups for all immune mediators ( p < 0.001), and pairwise comparisons confirmed significant differences between each group (HC vs.
Direct gradient ordination of ECM fungal communities using RDA showed that the effect of site was highly significant ( P < 0.001) in explaining the distribution of ECM species ( Figure 4A ).
also found that the incidence of hypotension was 10.5% (6/57) in patients with baseline PI ≤3.5 and 71.42% (45/63) in patients with baseline PI >3.5 which was clinically and statistically highly significant (p < 0.001).[ 5 ] Varghese RV found that the incidence of hypotension in group 1 (PI >3.5) was 86.67% whereas in group 2 (PI ≤3.5) was 6.67% which was highly significant (p < 0.05).[ 6 ] George et al . found that the incidence of hypotension was 66.7% among the study subjects and they concluded tha
*/^ p < 0.05 was considered significant, **/^^ p < 0.01 highly significant, ***/^^^ p < 0.001 very highly significant, ****/^^^^ p < 0.0001 extremely significant.
After 24 h of growth, ATc-induced drcAB expression caused a highly significant loss (83.33%; P < 0.001) of the initial DAP concentration (Fig. 2 ; Fig.
Among the covariates included in the fully adjusted model, TTP demonstrated a highly significant independent association with LAP (β = 0.46, P < 0.001).
A highly significant difference between the two groups was found regarding HBsAb titer ( p <0.001).
Statistical analysis McNemar's test of significance showed that there is highly significant difference between the two groups with P < 0.001.
The data indicated a significant increasing trend in the prevalence of DM, from 8.3% (in 2009) to 9.7% (in 2019) (p=0.004), in contrast the prevalence of CVD among patients with DM showed a decreasing trend (from 33.9% to 20.4%; p<0.001).
Mean age with specific manifestations was 56.86 ± 15.81 and with nonspecific/without any manifestations was 42.58 ± 16.96, a highly significant difference, with p-value < 0.001.
The association for education was also attenuated but remained highly significant; educated farmers had 15.8 times higher odds of good knowledge compared to illiterate farmers after adjusting for age (AOR = 15.8, 95% CI: 3.4–73.8, p < 0.001). 3.8.2.
These results were highly significant ( p < 0.001), but the FDR was 0.1, suggesting that ~10% of these predictions might be false positives.
The number of ICM cells was not different between the groups ( F 3,118 = 1.52, p = 0.21; Figure 8 A), but the difference in the TE cell number was highly significant ( F 3 ,118 = 5.85, p < 0.001; Figure 8 B), and subsequently, the ICM/TE ratio was significantly different between groups ( F 3,118 = 3.29, p = 0.023; Figure 8 C).
That in the right hemisphere following left half-field stimulation averaged 27 ms, whereas that in the left visual cortex following right half field stimulation was 38 ms, a highly significant difference between the hemifield conditions (F(1,56) = 12.4, p < 0.001).
For all the symptom scales, the differences in parent-child means were highly significant ( p < .001) for both genders with moderate to high effect sizes (0.34-0.87).
Both correlations were highly significant (p common : r = 0.78, p < 0.001; σ A : r = 0.69, p < 0.001).