Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of variance Pooled analysis of variance demonstrated highly significant effects of genotype, environment, and genotype × environment interaction ( p < 0.001) for all studied characters ( Table 3 ), reflecting substantial genetic variability and pronounced differential responses of genotypes across temperature regimes.
highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Since the total number of affected segments is small, the overlap between BAF250a-affected EtoL segments and Brg1-affected EtoL segments is highly significant relative to what would be expected for a random distribution ( P <0.001).
highly significantP < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In conclusion, the authors found a highly significant association of fibrinolytic markers, endothelial markers, and levels of coagulation (fibrinogen with a weighted mean difference of 0.43 and P < .001) with AF in AF patients compared to SR patients. 33 Another study reported a significant difference in the prothrombotic state (irregularity of blood coagulation) when patients with permanent as well as paroxysmal AF were compared to those with persistent AF or SR controls.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Applying a chi‐square text on the genotypes NN and NC observed in the first five years (from 2009 to 2013) versus the last five years (from 2014 to 2018), we obtained a value highly significant ( p < 0.001), so that the number of carrier subjects observed from 2014 to 2018 is significantly lower if compared to the one observed in the first five years.
clearly significantp ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualified
Priming and copying accuracy The full-null model comparison for the copying accuracy of relevant actions was clearly significant ( χ 2 = 22.997, df = 5, p ≤ 0.001), confirming that our test predictors had an effect.
Socially priming dogs in an overimitation task.
Front Psychol · 2023 · PMC9982082
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Changes in maximal arm muscle strength after suggestion Version A to gain informed consent after risk information, taken from every day clinical practice and suspected to be negative, resulted in a highly significant reduction of maximal arm muscle strength at both time points, namely by 16.9% at T1 and by 15.7% at T2 compared to baseline, respectively ( p < 0.001).