Excerpts

The difference in the rate of viral coinfections was highly significant ( p < 0.001, t test). 3.2.

There was a highly significant association between the category of the users and the themes of the tweets (χ 2 40 = 16904.4, P <.001).

The effect size across primary and sensitivity analyses (which were highly significant; p < 0.001) was between − 0.696 and − 0.964, indicating that a minimally detectable effect size was a one-point or less improvement on a 10-item knowledge test.

Although most sectors in both groups showed a trend of decreasing thickness, statistically significant reductions were observed only in the inferotemporal ( P < 0.001) and inferonasal ( P = 0.003) sectors in Group 2 (Fig. 2 ).

The mean orientation difference, 14.7 ± 5.53° (mean ± standard error across participants), was highly significant, t(49) = –18.92, p < 0.001, lgBF = 21.0.

A correlation coefficient of 0.54 was obtained, which was highly significant ( P < 0.001, two-tailed test).

Waist circumference, as an important measure of abdominal obesity, was reduced by 4.2 cm in the treatment group compared to 0.4 cm in the control group; there was a highly significant interaction between time and treatment ( p < 0.001).

The test results showed a highly significant association between the levels of problems across the dimensions, with χ 2 (8) = 155.37, p < 0.001.

The t-test result indicates that the difference between the beginning and the end of simulator use is highly significant ( p < 0.001), suggesting a systematic change between the two times.

There was no significant difference in survival and mean mass between either the CqSnf7 and DpSnf7 treatments versus the control (p > 0.05), whereas there was a highly significant difference between survival and mean mass in the DvSnf7_21.7 dsRNA versus the water-only control (p < 0.001).

When comparing serum CTx between baseline and day 8, all patients experienced a decrease in CTx levels, and this was highly significant (p < 0.001) as shown in Figure 3B .

Cure rates at 8 weeks were found to be greater than that at 4 weeks for all groups which were found to be highly significant ( P < 0.001).

At 36 months, significant and borderline significant declines in qHBsAg, respectively, were noted in the group A (p<0.001) and in group B (p = 0.068) patients ( Fig 2B ).

This difference between species was highly significant along PC2 (10% of variation; F 1,127 = 131.1, p < 0.001) and suggests a general trend of expansion of both the proximal and distal area of the MFB in H. melpomene Postman phenotypes compared to H. erato .

Total reading time The analysis revealed a highly significant main effect of semantic relation on the noun region, β = 99.68, SE = 6.74, t = 14.79, p < 0.001.

The standard drug too caused highly significant inhibition of paw edema throughout the observation period ( p < 0.001).

Whilst there has been highly significant genetic progress in the spring two row gene pool since the introduction of Triumph in 1980, and prior to 2000 (Fig. 2 ) ( β = 0.16; p = 0.001; R 2 = 0.48), the rate of progress since 2000 is non-significant ( β = − 0.06; p = 0.245; R 2 = 0.04) with a large scattering of the datapoints, indicating that breeding progress for the character has stalled or that the maximum attainable phenotype has been reached.

In contrast, caregivers with PTSS mostly reported mild symptom severity (86.1%), with five showing moderate severity (13.8%), and this difference was highly significant ( p = 0.001).

A Bartlett’s test of sphericity was conducted and demonstrated that outcomes for both domains were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

All of the associations were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The differences were highly significant ( F = 67.81; df = 2,8; P <0.001).

When considering all electrodes, after voice, the whole model showed a trend of an increase in gamma power with age ( p < 0.001), whereas responses after “click” decreased with age in the delta to alpha frequency bands power ( p < 0.01).

Bilateral IRI for 30 min caused significant deterioration of renal function with highly significant s-creatinine and BUN elevation ( n = 5 sham mice, n = 6 mice per IRI group, one-way ANOVA, *** p < 0.001).

viridis showed a highly significant preference towards Ae. albopictus larvae (GLMM model 2 ; P < 0,001; n = 15; Fig. 3 ).

On studying the effect of age on COVID-19 severity we found a highly significant association of age with COVID-19 severity where, people ≥ 50 years of age were found to be at risk of developing a severe form of COVID-19 ( p < 0.001) as compared to patients ≤ 50 years of age.