The effect of SY on histopathology scores of the liver was highly significant for SY60 group ( P < 0.001), compared to SY15 and control groups which recorded much lower values nearest to zero level.
Excerpts
As the “F” value calculated for experimental group is 54.84 which is highly significant, that is, greater than the table value at P ≤ 0.001 level of significance at df = 98, the data signifies that the NIP was very effective in reducing anxiety level.
Results : Aripiprazole exposure induced a dose-dependent reduction in the number of completely ossified skeletal bony centers ( p < 0.01) with a highly significant reduction in the length of ossified portions of the long bones ( p < 0.001).
The improvement was statistically highly significant in Group C as compared to group A ( P < 0.001) and group B ( P < 0.001).
The HTS data show a slightly higher standard deviation due to the lower number of analysed cells, but the differences in 1 μM AZT susceptibility between wild-type and mutant RT pseudotypes were highly significant (p <0.001).
The varieties showed highly significant (p < 0.001) among the year while the year and interaction effect (V × Y) varied (p < 0.05) for the variation of dry matter yield between the six Napier grass varieties.
A highly significant (P < 0.001) positive correlation was recorded among maize grain yield, RUE and gross margin ha −1 ( Table 7 ). 4.
These associations remained highly significant ( P < 0.001 for all) through sequential multivariate adjustment: first for other blood parameters (Model 1), then additionally for demographics (Model 2), comorbidities (Model 3), and finally angiographic severity (Model 4).
The obtained results were interpreted as follows: Insignificant = P > 0.05 Significant = P < 0.05, P < 0.01 Highly significant = P < 0.001 Overall effect of therapy Overall effect of therapy was estimated as follows: 100% relief – Cured >75% to <100% – Marked improvement >50% to 75% – Moderate improvement >25% to 50% – Mild improvement 0% to 25% – Unchanged Observations Maximum number of the patients, i.e., 66.67% belongs to the age group of 21-30 years (Mean age is 30.92 ± 8.2 years), 50% were married, and 75% were graduates and belongs to nuclear type of family.
When albuminuria was studied, a highly significant difference between patients with and without albuminuria was seen with respect to comet tail length (p < 0.001) (one-way-ANOVA) and ɤH2AX (p < 0.001) (one-way-ANOVA) ( Fig. 2 A and B).
While no significant association was found between PU and OCD ( X 2 = 3.085; n.s.), we found a highly significant ( X 2 = 15.379; p < 0.001) positive association between PU and OCB.
Maternal Influential Factors for PMPS The group comparison regarding two or more miscarriages (n = 208 out of total n = 3368) in the past showed a highly significant result in the chi-square test with p < 0.001.
The agreement between the classification based on both campaigns and each single campaign dataset was highly significant (99.3%, k = 0.991, p < 0.001 for the test, when the Baffin Bay was the training set and the Fram Strait dataset was predicted and 92.9% of agreement, k = 0.905, p < 0.001 when reversed, i.e., Fram Strait as training dataset and the Baffin Bay as predicted).
Results Functional Evaluation of Low-level Visual Age-related Changes ISF perimetry (Intermediate spatial frequency channel) We measured achromatic CS at an intermediate spatial frequency for nine visual field locations (see Figure 1A for data across quadrants and Figure 2 for representative examples of age-related CS decline obtained with ISF perimetry for each age group) and found a highly significant effect of aging on mean CS [F (4,164) = 53.09, p<0.001].
Our analysis revealed the following significant correlations between VA and satisfaction or frequency of spectacle use: A moderate positive correlation (rho = 0.635) exists between UDVA and satisfaction without spectacles at far distance, with a highly significant p -value ( p = 0.001); we also observed a moderate negative correlation (rho = −0.412) between UDVA and the frequency of use of spectacles for medium distance, with a statistically significant p -value ( p = 0.041).
As a matter of fact, the number of trichoid sensilla in LRRK WD40 mutants males exceeded the WT number with highly significant difference ( P ≤ 0.001).
In detail for feces isolates, directly before weaning (24 days of age) and at the age of 38 days the proportion of multi-resistant isolates did not differ between the two feeding groups (chi-square-test; 24 days of age p = 0.579, 38 days of age p = 0.254) but at the age of 52 days we observed a highly significant difference with 29% multi-resistant isolates in the zinc group and only 14% multi-resistant isolates in the control group (chi-square-test; p = 0.001).
Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a highly significant survival benefit for the responder group compared with the nonresponder group (log‐rank test, P <0.001).
Analysing the BEWE scores by oral location, the averages for mandible and maxillar were 0.14 ± 0.45 and 0.25 ± 0.64 respectively, and the difference was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001).
Gray’s test revealed prior PJI as a highly significant risk factor for re-infection ( p = 0.001).
In contrast, mean TEWL was lower in the AGA group than in controls for both the vertex and occipital areas, with the vertex presenting a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
However, Spearman rank correlation between the two sets of test results was highly significant ( p < 0.001; r = 0.7; 95% CL 0.6–0.9) (Figure 4 ).
Highly significant correlation was observed between TPC and TFC (r = 0.973, ( p < 0.001).
A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (∗), a P value of < 0.01 was considered highly significant (∗∗), a P value of < 0.001 was considered very highly significant (∗∗∗), and a P value of > 0.05 was labelled as n.s (not significant).
The SUVs of sub-centimeter fludeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid pulmonary nodules with Q.Clear illustrated highly significant differences from those reconstructed with other algorithms (P < 0.001).