LE/P + SLB showed a highly significant superior outcome ( p < 0.001) in relation to non-LE/P + CB, the QRR of 23 were 0.813 ± 0.114 mm and 1.156 ± 0.166 mm, respectively.
Excerpts
Sunshine Daily sunshine duration was highly significant longer during the F-months in the two-week interval (6.0 h vs. 3.7 h, p < 0.001, r = 0.35).
However, a highly significant effect of Valence was found for Bias [ F (1,35) = 29.11, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.45], with significantly higher bias for negative words, and also a main effect of Genotype [ F (1,35) = 6.56, p = 0.02, η p 2 = 0.16], with significantly lower bias in Met carriers than Val homozygotes (see Figure 1 ).
One-way variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis, and Tukey’s comparison test was used to obtain a significant difference ( p < 0.05 was significant, p < 0.01 was extremely significant, and p < 0.001 was highly significant).
Results Our instructions successfully elicited three desired reading aloud tempi: the full model for the total reading time was clearly significant compared to the null model (likelihood ratio test: χ 2 = 169.43, df = 3, p < 0.001, effect size for the full model: R 2 m = 0.72, R 2 c = 0.82).
To test for statistical significance, we ran a repeated measures analysis of variance, which showed a highly significant effect of condition, F (2,76) = 795.55, p < .001, n 2 = .954.
After adjusting for covariates, the regression analysis showed a highly significant association (p value< 0.001) between unemployment and psychological distress (OR=1.55; 95% CI 1.03, 2.31), and alcohol consumption (OR=0.67; 95% CI 0.48, 0.92).
The analysis revealed a highly significant effect on the model fit [ χ 2 (1) = 222.59, p < 0.001].
PC2 showed highly significant lower survival probabilities than PC1 ( p < 0.001).
As expected, the difference between GM and WM in all males and all females was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Figure 4 A).
The odds of self-reported sleep disturbances were increased across all preventive measures, and most of the findings are highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The difference in weight-for-age z -score by hukou status is also highly significant ( p < 0.001) for children with rural residence, but only significant at the 10 % level for those with urban residence.
Results The univariate LME showed highly significant differences between previously malnourished and control groups ( p < 0.001); age ( p = 0.01) was also significant, with no interaction between group and age detected.
The incidence of MetS exhibited a decreasing trend across the percent change in SUA quartile category in both sexes (both P <0.001).
One-way ANOVA with Post-hoc test (Bonferroni) showed that all clustering above 0.04 (correlation coefficient of 0.96) were highly significant ( P < 0.001).
And indeed, a paired t -test showed a highly significant difference in the average firing rate of “Spatial Mapping” trials (15.64 spikes/s) and “Tuning” trials (19.80 spikes/s) ( t (138) = 5.98, p < 0.001).
The 10% aqueous fraction ointment showed significant wound contraction from day 2 onwards (p < 0.01), highly significant from days 6 to 10 (p < 0.001), surpassing the positive control's effect except on day 12.
(2015) found that Glu-B1i and Glu-D1d showed a highly significant positive effect ( P < 0.001) on SV and also had additive effects.
There was a highly significant correlation between plasma levels of venlafaxine + ODV and the percentage of whole-blood 5-HT depletion ( r = 0.54, P < .001), reaching more than 80% with the plasma levels ≥200 ng/mL ( supplemental Figure 1A ).
The impact of performance expectancy on behavioral intention in the chronic conditions group was highly significant (β=.46, P <.001), confirming our rationale that the expectancy of the benefits obtained with the use of mHealth technology to manage health strongly influences the intention of using it for patients with chronic conditions.
The reduction in urinary leakage episodes, improvement in pelvic floor muscle strength and enhancement in quality of life scores were all highly significant (p < 0.001) (Table 5 - see PDF).
showed a trendP < 0.001
Paratyphi A, B showed a trend of increasingly reduced susceptibility against ciprofloxacin (χ 2 = 24.3 and 66.1 respectively, P < 0.001) throughout this study period (Table 3 ).
Correlation analysis showed highly significant comparisons ( r = 0.99, P < 0.001; r = 0.97, P < 0.001, respectively), with carotenoid accumulation at 90 dafb in fruit skin and flesh.
A highly significant difference among treatment groups ( p < 0.001) was observed (Fig. 4 ).
IPA analysis on inbred lines found only two pathways as significant of which the ‘Role of BRCA1 in DNA Damage Response’ was found highly significant ( P < 0.001; with 20 of the 71 genes passing the cut-off criteria).