faecalis was highly significant ( P < 0.001) compared to PI-based mouth rinse [Figure 4a and b ].
Excerpts
Lipid peroxidation products in the spermatozoa The level of 4-HNE, an electrophilic aldehyde and a natural by product of LPO compared with the level in the fertile normozoospermic group manifested a highly significant increase in both the OAT ( p <0.001) and AST ( p =0.003) groups ( Figure 2 ).
The indirect effect of OPAC on JP through JS was also moderately significant ( β = 0.109, p < 0.001), and the corresponding VAF was 90.8%, indicating full mediation for this pathway.
These differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
NC as an indicator of metabolic syndrome The highly significant association between abnormal NC and MetS (chi-square = 218.71, p < 0.001) is the cardinal finding of this study.
This is also supported by the observed statistically highly significant interaction term (p<0.001) between life event stress and the character trait optimism vs pessimism (line 325).
The fixation indices F IS , F ST , and F IT were 0.80, 0.97, and 0.99, respectively, and, together with their corresponding variance components, all of them were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Conversely, CK-7, which was 100% positive in ICC and only 30% in HCC, showed highly significant differential expression ( p < 0.001), supporting its established role as a key marker for cholangiocytic differentiation [ 56 , 57 , 58 ].
For the subgroup analysis, a moderately significant negative relationship between overall resilience and psychological distress was found among healthcare workers (r = −0.39, 95% CI: −0.44 to −0.33, p < 0.001), which was weaker than in the general population (r = −0.45, 95% CI: −0.50 to −0.39, p < 0.001) and in patients (r = −0.43; 95% CI: −0.52 to −0.33; p < 0.001).
In addition, the results of that study indicated that the estimated VO2max was a moderately significant predictor of Astrand submaximal VO2max (r = 0.688, p < 0.001).
The values shared highly significant correlation ( P < 0.001; r = 0.987) when compared with Pearson correlation test and Bland and Altman method [ Table 2 ].
In the species-only model, species richness alone demonstrated a highly significant positive relationship with the number of authors ( β = 0.662, p < 0.001).
In a comparison among equipopulated groups for the signal power before normalization, the occipital electrode showed a significant ( p < .05) RMS increase in the “initial” set of measurements after deafening as compared to those “before” deafening, and a highly significant ( p < .001) increase in the “last” set of measurements after deafening as compared to those “before” deafening (Fig. 2 A).
All these correlations were highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001).
The calculated value of t = 14.548 and t = 8.601 was statistically highly significant at a p < .001 level ( Table 3 ).
As can be seen from Table 4 , the model is extremely significant ( p < 0.001), the coefficient of determination R 2 of the model is 0.9973, and the lack of fit is not significant (0.7224 > 0.05).
Regression analysis showed a highly significant effect ( P < 0.001) considering the body weight of each mouse, using the CalR platform and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) statistical analyses 37 .
Biochemical Parameters in Serum As shown in Table 4 , there was an increasing trend of activities of GOT and GPT with the increasing proportion of LQBFM combined with 0.50% CAs; the lowest values were both found in the LQBFM20+CAs group ( p < 0.001).
The traditional change between visits 2 and 3 was of borderline significance in both groups, but the addition of the then-test again led to highly significant actual change (p < 0.001 in both groups).
The main effect of regulation type was highly significant ( F (1,115) = 290.42, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.716), with participants reporting fewer negative feelings in the reappraisal (3.02 ± 1.02) than in the no-reappraisal (5.00 ± 1.02) sessions.
* p < 0.05, significant; ** p < 0.01, moderately significant; *** p < 0.001, highly significant; and **** p < 0.0001, extremely significant.
Decision-making efficiency (number of adjustments) Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that the main effect of strategy conditions on the number of adjustments was extremely significant ( F (1, 17) = 185.3, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.91).
A 3 (difficulty) x 11 (sound level) x 2 (noise sensitivity groups) mixed-factors analysis of variance (ANOVA) in which task difficulty and sound level constituted within-subjects factors revealed a highly significant main effect of sound level on the annoyance ratings, F (10,270)=46.06; P <0.001; η 2 =0.19.
Richness in forests showed a decreasing trend with increasing latitude (slope = -0.022, P < 0.001), whereas in urban areas, although there was a decreasing trend, it was not significant (slope = -0.003, P > 0.05).
reported a highly significant association between knowledge and literacy.[ 16 ] Itrat et al . also reported that literate people were relatively well-informed in comparison to illiterate ( P < 0.001).[ 24 ] Contrarily, Joseph et al . and Alobuia et al . reported no association between knowledge and sociodemographic profile.[ 25