Excerpts

Furthermore, the ANOVA analysis revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences among the groups.

Joint space analysis and condylar position The assessment of joint spaces showed a highly significant difference in the anterior space (AS) among the groups ( P < 0.001).

[ 19 ] noted a highly significant correlation between these two tests ( r = 0.87; p < 0.001).

The difference in mean concentration of LA between the dietary treatment groups was less than 10% (15.5 g/100 g fat and 16.4 g/100 g fat) but the difference between the groups was highly significant (P = 0.001) [ 3 ].

A significant trend ( p < 0.001) of decreased levels in individuals with CRC, other cancers and colorectal adenomas are shown compared with individuals with other non-malignant findings and clean colorectum.

Even at the lowest concentration (0.1 μg L −1 ) the change was highly significant ( p < 0.001), as shown in Fig. 8(a) .

This decrease occurred along a significantly different curve shape for dark- medium- and light-colored honeys as shown by a highly significant interaction between color and dilution ( p < 0.001).

There was a decreasing trend in lung V20 in accordance with severity of emphysema (Jonckheere–Terpstra test, P < 0.001) (Fig. 3 ).

Age showed a highly significant positive effect on both SBP and DBP ( p < 0.001).

It was seen that all the morbidities were more prevalent in EG, that is, Group A and the difference of prevalence of morbidities between Group A and B was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001), except the musculoskeletal disorders in which difference in prevalence was not statistically significant.

Antibodies to other antigens degenerated more rapidly in younger individuals (EBA181, p = 0.02; PfRh2, p = 0.05) and the decline of MSP2 antibodies in younger individuals was highly significant (p = 0.001) ( Fig 3B ).

From 2008 to 2018, national average SMR of cancer in Chinese rural areas also showed a decreasing trend (AAPC=−2.53%, P <0.001).

This analysis confirmed that the increase in braille reading speed was highly significant (effect of testing session: F(5, 130) = 35.85, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.57).

Furthermore, there was a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.001) in the mortality of larvae pre-treated with L. reuteri ( Figure 7 ).

We observed an increasing trend of the median CD4 + cell count in women without AHD during the 36 months follow-up ( p < 0.001), however, this remained constantly below 200 cells/mm 3 in women presenting with AHD at first ANC clinic visit.

Highly significant, moderate, positive correlations between mRNA levels of CK5 and CK14 (τ = 0.40, 95%CI 0.29-0.51, p < 0,001), between CK5 and CK17 (τ = 0.51, 95%CI 0.40-0.62, p < 0,001), and between CK14 and CK17 (τ = 0.36, 95%CI 0.25-0.47, p < 0,001) were observed.

As shown in Table 1 , there are highly significant differences in terms of the number of cases with high IGFIR expression between the colorectal cancer and the normal group ( P < 0.001) or between the cancer and the adenoma group ( P < 0.001).

The full model was highly significant (F 12.612 = 28.565, p < 0.001; with an R 2 = 0.36).

Results The P100 amplitude showed a significant difference among all treatment sessions with a decreasing trend in the study group after PRP ( P <0.001).

Urgency of operation (emergency) had a highly significant suppressive effect on PONV risk in the crude bivariate logistic regression model at the 5% level (odds ratio 0.176; CI, 0.072-0.43; P < 0.001) (Table 2 .).

The differences in mean weights between high-fat- and standard-fed mice were highly significant ( P < 0.001) from age 9 wk onward (6 wk on diets).

This difference in likelihood is highly significant assuming a χ 2 distribution ( P < 0.001; Table 1 ).

We found a significant effect of age : w AlbB interaction ( F = 4.55, P = 0.037), a significant effect of population ( F = 3.58, P = 0.034) and a highly significant effect of w AlbB ( P <0.001), while all other interactions or main effects were non significant ( P >0.05).

The LMM model used for the FSS questionnaire ( Table 4 and Figure 3 ) identified highly significant effects ( p < 0.001) for measurements, treatments, and also for their interaction.

Convergent and discriminant validity yielded both highly significant results (r = .79, p < .001, resp. r = .38, p < .001).