Excerpts

Apart from alcoholism, highly significant associations were also found in the subgroups of patients with AST > 37 U/L (OR 1.038, 95% C.I. 1.015–1.063, P = 0.001) and bilirubin > 0.8 mg/dL (OR 1.042, 95% C.I. 1.017–1.068, P = 0.001, Fig. 2 ).

3 Results and discussion 3.1 The effect of fungicide rates on disease severity There was a highly significant difference (P < 0.001) between the treatments for disease severity starting from the 3rd data scoring.

Based on the results of the Cochran–Armitage test for trend, there was an increasing trend in ICR between the three groups ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

The effect of herbivore removal was marginally evident after 3 years (Treatment contrast for bare patches in 2002: F 1,20 = 3.99, p = .059), and highly significant after 17 years (Treatment contrast for bare patches in 2016: F 1,20 = 14.60, p = .001).

The values of NUE at Darien showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) correlation with SNF traits corresponding to %Ndfa_Sh, %Ndfa_Sd, TNdfa_Sh, TNdfa_Sd (Table 4 ).

Patients with sustained improvement achieved a 41.5 μmol/L decrease in creatinine concentration at 3 months, whereas patients with deterioration showed only a 7.5 μmol/L reduction, indicating a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) ( Table 4 and Figure 2 ). 3.6.

Instrumentation and irrigation resulted in a highly significant reduction of CFU counts ( p < 0.001), again with no difference between groups (Table 2 ).

This non-linear relationship was confirmed by a Generalized Additive Model, which demonstrated that the smooth term for glucose was highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating a complex, non-linear interaction between these biomarkers.

faecalis was highly significant ( P < 0.001) compared to PI-based mouth rinse [Figure 4a and b ].

The positive expectancies of cannabis use effects score measured among the participants demonstrated an increasing trend (T1: mean 6.41, SD 2.85; T2: mean 7.20, SD 2.93; T3: mean 7.96, SD 2.99; P <.001).

The negbin variant of count models was used as the estimated alpha parameters were greater than zero and highly significant (p < 0.001); and, the dependent variables had no zero observations.

The mean values of the two sessions (calculated as intercept in the robust regression in Fig 4 ) showed highly significant test-retest correlations of 0.93, 0.80, and 0.73 (p < 0.001) for heterophoria, subjective and objective fixation disparity, respectively.

Mendalawi’s notion, that the use of disease specific HRQoL tool maybe more representative; however, this does not undermine our findings using a generic tool like PedsQL; especially that Klaassen et al (the creators of TranQoL) found a highly significant correlation between TranQL and PedsQL in the 55 thalassemia major patients they enrolled ( p <0.001, r =0.77). 3 However, we agree with Prof.

A significant trend toward lower VT recurrence over time was observed (–1.15% per year, 95% CI –1.72% to –0.58%, P < .001).

The control group presented a highly significant rate of decay during storage ( p < 0.001).

Functionality of FDS showed highly significant results (p<0.001) depicting variability on two sides in terms of dependent and independent function.

This decrease was highly significant (p < 0.001) with an effect size of 68%.

For AI, the main effect of group was also highly significant ( p < 0.001), accompanied by a very large effect size ( η p 2 = 0.54), showing that EG was significantly greater than NG.

The likelihood-ratio statistic for the null hypothesis that study affiliation has no effect on SSPS score is highly significant ( P < 0.001) so that it can be concluded that there is a strong association between study and score, with Warwick participants being more likely than those reported by Freeman et al.

Table 7 revealed a highly significant association between LBP and both playing experience (p < 0.001) and the duration of practice per week (p < 0.001).

Highly significant differences were observed for calcium (mg/dL), F(2, 147) = 42.8, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.368, and phosphorus (mg/dL), F(2, 147) = 53.6, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.422, with post-hoc comparisons indicating significant differences between all groups.

Repeatability testing demonstrated highly significant inter ( k + 0.86, p < 0.001) and intra ( k = 0.74, p < 0.001) observer (intra-class) correlation coefficients ( k ).

To identify DEGs for each personality we selected genes that were highly significant (ANOVA P < 0.001) for proactive and reactive individuals.

The difference in mean VAS scores between the two groups was highly significant (P < 0.001), clearly establishing the superiority of the intraoperative local anesthetic cocktail administered in Group-A over regional anesthesia alone in Group-B for immediate post-operative pain control following knee arthroscopy.

In line with previous studies [ 12 , 13 ], all examined relationships between OIDP scores and subjective oral health measures were statistically significant and showed a clear trend in the expected direction; worst the subjective oral health rating, higher the OIDP scores ( p < 0.001).