Post-hoc analysis showed a highly significant difference in iron (p = 0.001) and calcium (p < 0.001) levels in osteolytic tissues compared to non-osteolytic tissues.
Excerpts
While the sample size is modest, the one-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences among groups (F(3,12) = 739.15, p < 0.001).
The interaction between genotype and salinity was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for yield ( Table 1 ).
scariosum and statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) for R. bicknellii ( Table 2 and Table 3 and Table S6c–d in Supplementary file S5 ).
Testosterone showed highly significant effect modification by fetal sex for both overall and spontaneous PTB (both interaction p<0.001), with an IQR increase in testosterone conferring lower risk of PTB among male fetuses and higher risk among female fetuses which did not differ between study visits.
The results of the Mann–Whitney U-test for groupwise comparisons were also highly significant [ P < 0.001 (highly significant)].
A Linear Mixed Effect Model (with participant, scene and ordinal trial number entered as random effects) revealed that there was a highly significant effect of scene organization on the distance from the center of each quadrant ( t = 35.94, p < 0.001), with scenes that were scrambled having fixations that were 14.67% closer to the quadrant center (Figure 3 ).
Night temperature was also a highly significant (df = 1, 109, F = 59.75, p < 0.001) driver on time to 50% germination (germination rate, 1/T 50 ), accounting for over one third of percentage variance in response.
6(iii) ) exhibited a highly significant recovery, returning to near-baseline levels in the treatment group ( p < 0.001 ).
Other predictors (covariates or control variables) in the models The predictors birthdate, breed and growth phase were highly significant (P value<0.001) in our regression models for all five outcomes).
Meanwhile, GCA effects were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for TCC, very significant ( P < 0.01) for DMC, significant ( P < 0.05) for HI, but non-significant for FRW and FSW.
In the fully adjusted Model 3: RNFL Rate = −1.21 − 0.147 × ISI + 0.014 × Age − 0.132 × Sex male − 0.747 × Untreated ISI remained highly significant (β = -0.147, SE = 0.041, p = 0.001), with each unit increase predicting 0.147 μm/year faster progression ( Fig. 2 ).
Dispersion of samples showed a decreasing trend from day 1 to day 35, with day 35 having significantly less dispersion (PERMDISP; p < 0.001) than the rest of the time points ( Figure 3 A, Table S4A ).
The overall improvement in model fit was highly significant (nested chi-square = 99.92, df = 6, p <.001).
Compliance improved by 12.4 percentage points (97.20% vs 84.80%), and satisfaction by 15.8 percentage points (95.40% vs 79.60%), both highly significant (P<0.001).
Spearman analysis showed highly significant correlations at α and β (r=0.88 and r=0.87, respectively; P<0.001).
Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 were considered highly significant). 4 Results The chemical composition of Protium heptaphyllum essential oil (PHEO) is presented in Table .
This highly significant difference (p < 0.001) indicates that CCDs required more frequent post-insertion adjustments due to tissue changes or instability.
Group B demonstrated the most effective ulcer healing compared to group C, as evident by the highly significant p -value on day 28 ( p < 0.001).
In the final 20% of the simulation (steps 64–80), DeepONet RL’s SEM band shows minimal overlap with Pure TD3’s, suggesting statistical significance ( p < 0.05), while LQR’s complete separation indicates a highly significant gap ( p < 0.001). 4.2.2 Spatio-temporal state consistency.
The reduction in urinary leakage episodes, improvement in pelvic floor muscle strength and enhancement in quality of life scores were all highly significant (p < 0.001) (Table 5 - see PDF).
The direct link between site and ecoregion richness for all taxa was weak despite a highly significant correlation between these two metrics ( R 2 = 0.35, P < 0.001; fig.
Similarly, there was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) positive correlation between FACIT-F and physical (+0.70) and emotional scores (+0.45) of QOL.
It shows the significant result (P <0.05) for weight and highly significant for height (P=0.001).
Alternative analysis by comparison of individual vessel size for each tissue type was highly significant ( Supplementary Figure S1A ) and analysis of vessel density showed a 2.4-fold increase in the number of vessels per field in NU compared with IP tissue ( p = 0.001, Figure 3 A).