The treatment contrast between LoSD and HSD from the GLMM was highly significant (2.7±0.06 (SE), z = 47.7; p<<0.001).
Excerpts
Of particular importance, a strong, positive, and highly significant correlation persisted between IMWG response categories at 12 weeks and 24 weeks (Kendall’s tau-b = 0.627, P < 0.001; Spearman’s P = 0.678, P < 0.001), demonstrating that early treatment responses strongly predicted subsequent outcomes throughout the course of therapy.
At one month, a highly significant decrease occurred in VAS and ODI in the lidocaine and ozone groups compared to the botulinum toxin group ( p < 0.001).
The differences in the incidence of the individual patho-anatomic findings in the individual organs and body parts were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).
PERMANOVA on ‘dynamisms’ (main effects and pairwise tests) Main effect and pairwise test The three-way PERMANOVA (excluding ‘shame’ and ‘guilt’) revealed highly significant main effects for ‘dynamism’ (Pseudo- F = 15.53, p = 0.001), ‘Location’ (Pseudo- F = 4.52, p = 0.001), and ‘Time’ (Pseudo- F = 18.07, p = 0.001) ( Supplementary Table S6a ).
There was a highly significant association (P<0.001) between sex and place of tobacco use.
A two-tailed Student’s t-test indicated that the difference in total CFU was highly significant ( P <0.001).
The combination of site and tree species was highly significant ( p < 0.001), showing a strong interaction between these factors on the number of isolates per needle.
Environmental niche differentiation and ecological niche metrics The MANOVA revealed a highly significant overall species effect on the combined environmental variables (Pillai’s trace = 0.89, F = 8.90, p < 0.001; Table S4 ), confirming distinct environmental niches among the three Dianthus taxa.
Highly significant Pearson correlation coefficients were obtained for combined TD and suspected DLD groups ( r [27] = 0.956, p < 0.001), TD group only ( r [15] = 0.974, p < 0.001), and the suspected DLD group only ( r [12] = 0.940, p < 0.001) when comparing Scores A with Scores B.
However GBI scores, after the use of all four mouthwashes when compared to baseline GBI scores were highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 3 ].
In AS patients, the occurrence of ANS shows an increasing trend with age (r = 0.233, P = 0.001).
The Astarales/Asteraceae (Daisies and related plants) and Poales/Poaceae (grasses, sedges, and reeds) are consistently among the most commonly studied invasive plants across time, and there is an increasing trend for scientists to study invasive legumes (i.e., Fabaceae) ( χ 2 = 6.2, df = 1, p = .001) (Figure 7 ).
Interestingly, a highly significant correlation was obtained ( p <0.001; R = 0.54).
The result is statistically significant when P ≤ 0.05 (α = 5.00%) and highly significant when P ≤ 0.001 (α = 0.10%).
The Tukey test indicated a highly significant difference ( P < .001) in the flexural strength of specimen containing 100% recast alloy as compared to another specimen [ Table 1 ].
Atretic follicle PCOS group showed a highly significant (p < 0.001) increase in number of atretic follicles as compared to control group.
In contrast, the ER/MT enriched fractions (#7 and #8) that display low detectable PrP res levels, contained high infectivity levels similar to the lipid raft enriched fractions, with the discrepancy at fraction #8 highly significant (p < 0.001; two way ANOVA).
In OSMF, comparison between mild (grade1) versus moderate (grade 2) is not significant ( P = 0.367), but mild (grade 1) versus severe (grade 3) and moderate (grade 2) versus severe (grade 3) is highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 7 ].
Analysis of variance and broad-sense heritability ANOVA results for all traits and years indicated that genotype was a highly significant factor (p< 0.001) influencing phenotypic variation.
Nurse mentors’ knowledge regarding mentorship Table 2 shows that there was a highly significant improvement post-program in the studied nurse mentors’ knowledge compared with pre-program results in all scale domains (p < 0.001).
Similarly, the perceived adequacy of the training was highly significant ( p < 0.001): 7.8% of those who considered it adequate reported high scores, compared to 33.3% of those who judged it “not entirely adequate”.
This deviation in the distribution of DNA-binding domains (DBDs) amongst the global regulators from the background distribution of DBDs was found to be highly significant (Figure 8 A; p < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test).
On the other hand, the main effect of time is highly significant, p < 0.001.
Though the mean BMI was similar in both the groups(25.5 and 24.2), there was a statistically highly significant difference in mean waist circumference(92.1 cm and 81.2 cm, p < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure(80.5 and 75.3 mm Hg, p < 0.001) in patients with RA as compared to controls.