Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant correlation between the planned pitch and the deviation in pitch ( p < 0.001; correlation coefficient 0.489), planned right/left, and difference right/left ( p < 0.001; correlation coefficient 0.335) as well as planned back/front to difference back/front ( p < 0.001; correlation coefficient 0.345). 4.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The interactions between tannin type and concentration (T × C) and tannin type and water level (T × W) were both highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all the analyzed variables except for dCP_BP ( p = 0.157), while the interaction between tannin concentrations and water level (C × W) was insignificant in all variables.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Heritability was estimated by the formulae of Wricke and Weber ( 1986 ): H = σ 2 g / σ 2 p. Results Variation of the parental banana germplasm for Fusarium wilt Genotype mean squares determined by ANOVA were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for RDI and LSI as the measure of Fusarium wilt resistance and non-significant for PSS ( P > 0.05) (Table 4 ).
highly significantp-value<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The comparison of quality of life scores of the control group with the patient's group before getting the support was tested using an independent sample t-test and found to be non-significant (p=0.496), while a similar comparison between the control group and the patient's group after receiving the support was found to be statistically highly significant with a p-value of 8.721 × 10 -28 (p-value<0.001).
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
biomarker glycemic control insulin resistance obesity skeletal muscle echo intensity ultrasound National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 10.13039/100000062 DK133298 DK131724 Skeletal MEI There was a highly significant difference in mean deltoid MEI values between the obesity group (82.39 ± 28.32) and the healthy, lean group (33.41 ± 6.21) ( p < .001), with a mean difference of 48.98, representing a 146.6% increase relative to the lean group (Figure 2 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Based on the conducted Two‐Way Repeated Measures ANOVA, the proportion of pectins in the neck cell wall (NCW) statistically differed from that in the stalk cell wall (SCW), which is supported by a highly significant dependency of the enzymatic hydrolysis effect on the cell position ( p < 0.001).