The effect was highly significant (p<0.001) for both the doses.
Excerpts
Results of the repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that the VAS score was lower in the observation group than that the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (intergroup effect: F = 18.888, P < 0.001), which demonstrated a decreasing trend with time (time effect: F = 956.781, P < 0.001), and an interaction effect was observed between group and time (interaction effect: F = 16.445, P < 0.001).
Age was a highly significant non-linear coefficient for GEDV with large inter-individual variance (p < 0.001).
A highly significant difference was observed in hemoglobin ( P < 0.001).
The noted difference was statistically highly significant ( P <0.001).
Additionally, there was a highly significant linear trend ( p < .001), confirming a linear increase in subjective value with increase in retail price.
Comparison of all females with a cancer diagnosis under the age of 18 years with their age-matched controls shows that there is a highly significant difference in the chance of a first livebirth ( P < 0.001) (Fig. 1 ).
Results showed clear age gradients in intervention effects: In the ≤ 45 years group, the intervention group's FSFI total score was on average 6.8 points higher than the control group (24.6 ± 3.2 vs 17.8 ± 3.0), with 38.2% improvement amplitude and extremely significant statistical differences ( P < 0.001); in the 46-55 years group, intervention effects were also significant, with FSFI total scores improving by 5.9 points (23.9 ± 3.4 vs 18.0 ± 3.1), representing 32.8% improvement ( P < 0.001); in the > 55 years group, although intervention still produced positive effects, the degree of improvement was relatively weaker, with FSFI total scores improving by only 3.7 points (21.5 ± 3.8 vs 17.8 ± 3.5), representing 20.8% improvement, with statistical differences present but reduced significance( P = 0.032, Figure 4 ).
As expected, they predicted gains more on 3‐cue trials than 2‐cue trials ( p < .001), which was in turn more than 1‐cue trials ( p < .001), as revealed by a highly significant main effect of winning probability, F (2, 74) = 143.44, p < .001, ηp 2 = 0.80.
Coefficients of multivariate models were mostly highly significant ( p < 0.001) for both climate databases (Table 2 ).
Results Growth Attributes For shoot and root length, data showed a highly significant (p < 0.001) difference in drought, varieties and foliar applied ASA with significant interactions among these factors at vegetative stage of chickpea showed in Table 1 .
HER2 gene amplification showed a highly significant positive association with Her2 (3+) protein scoring ( P < 0.001) and was detected in 78/702 (11.1%).
One-way ANOSIM also revealed a highly significant effect of sampling site (Global test R = 0.797, P = 0.001) based on fish abundance data, represented a significant difference among the four group of those sites.
Finally, the highly significant p-value yielded by the Anova test (p < 0.001) strengthened our preference for the two-factor model.
The mean and standard deviation after the second cycle of bleaching was M=290 SD= 16.6, which showed decrease by 2.3% and was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
In the present work, the level of serum HDL-c showed a positive, highly significant correlation with interstitial testicular tissue area (r=0.73; p<0.001) and STs area (r=0.61; p<0.01).
Furthermore, when the data from these three areas were combined and compared with the combined data from the three areas within the default network, we confirmed that the Age × Task interaction was significantly larger in the default network than outside it (that is, the three-way interaction among Age, Task, and Brain Area (in or out of default network) was highly significant [ F (1,30) = 18.44, p < 0.001].
Stent assisted coiling resulted in a highly significant increase of the inflow angle α from a mean value (SEM) of 119° (±6.5°) pretreatment to 130° (±6.6°) posttreatment (P ≤ .001).
In contrast, the compressive strength ( f u , c ) showed statistically significant main effects of both fibre treatment ( p = 0.009) and fibre content ( p < 0.001), together with a highly significant treatment × content interaction ( p < 0.001).
Correlation between smell and taste tests A highly significant association between tested hyposmia and tested hypogeusia was found (φ = 0.24; p <0.001).
Conversely, the ePTFE group exhibited a major safety concern: a highly significant increase ( p ≤ 0.001) in Grade 4 dense, inseparable adhesions throughout the abdominal cavity, which were entirely absent in the JSP group.
The correlation study between the SSP and RBS total scores was highly significant (Rho = −0.80 ( p < 0.001)).
This difference was highly significant as determined by the independent sample t-test (P<0.001).
The results demonstrated that all three factors exhibited highly significant negative correlations with both archaeal and bacterial community similarity ( p < 0.001), indicating a typical distance-decay pattern.
The results were presented as means +/± standard deviation (SD), and the difference between means is considered significant if ∗ P < 0.05, very significant if ∗∗ P < 0.01, and extremely significant if ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.