The difference between the mean of pre-intervention and post-intervention scores in doctors, nurses, and other health care professionals was statistically very highly significant (P-value <0.001).
Excerpts
Correlation tests, seen in Table 3 , indicated a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) between the breed and implementation of extended lactation.
This highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) remained stable even after 3 patients with extremely high numbers of previous syncopal events were removed from the analysis.
A standard threshold of 5 CTC/7.5 ml blood as a cut-off point between risk groups led to a highly significant prognostic marker (p < 0.001).
When comparing the POV between the ethanol and paper point subgroups irrespective of the obturating material, the difference was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001) in favor of ethanol subgroup ( Graph 1 ).
Native and exotic species pairs in the same genus had consistently similar leaf damage, but differences between genera were highly significant ( P < 0.001 for each combination of genera).
All tests revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).
Cooling effect on RR and RT The effects of cooling, time, day, as well as interactions between cooling and day, and cooling and time were highly significant for sow respiration (P < 0.001).
The mean deviation of surface roughness SMD gets highly significant correlation value ( p < 0.001) to tensile properties.
Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.001.
Of the selected 3 seed regions for the quantitative measurements, the ReHo values of the cuneus showed a decreasing trend from ReHo controls (1.37±0.25) to ReHo non-HE (1.34±0.23) to ReHo MHE (1.08±0.24) ( F = 8.263, P = 0.001).
In the PENS-Diet group, the median values received a score of 2 (range 1–4), representing a significant trend towards constipation ( p < 0.001).
The association between age of initiation and quitting came out to be highly significant (p<0.001) (Table 5 ).
Overall histological agreement between the LCNB specimen and finding at excision biopsy was highly significant ( P =0.001).
A highly significant difference between the two groups was found regarding HBsAb titer ( p <0.001).
The regression model revealed that preoperative BCVA was a highly significant predictor of postoperative BCVA (0.377 [0.270; 0.485], p < 0.001) indicating that higher preoperative BCVA values were strongly associated with higher postoperative BCVA values.
PitNETs/adenomas demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation with the NET-like signature ( r = 0.74, p < 0.001) and a negative correlation with the adenoma-like signature ( r = −0.5, p < 0.001; Fig. 2 B + C, Supplementary Table 2 ).
A one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of classifier type on accuracy in the Delta band, F(5, 24) = 184.79, p < .001, η2 = 0.97, indicating a large effect size.
For all the statistical tests, differences were considered significant at p < 0.01 and highly significant at p < 0.001.
The correlation between CM and audiometric thresholds is highly significant across all frequencies for both AC and BC (r ∧ 2 = 0.84, n = 21, p < 0.001 for AC; r ∧ 2 = 0.68, n = 15, p < 0.001 for BC).
We found a highly significant difference between sCD26 levels in healthy donors (mean 559.7 ± 125.5 μg l –1 ) and cancer patients (mean 261.7 ± 138.1 μg l –1 ) ( P < 0.001).
There was a significant trend for patients with increasing tumour stage to have more rapidly proliferating tumours with higher mean labelling index (LI) measurements ( P = 0.001) and a shorter mean potential doubling time (Tpot) ( P = 0.023).
Multivariate logistic regression analysis for the prediction of the risk of cardiotoxicity among survivors is shown in Table 5 There was a statistically significant relation between height, BMI, and CLEF4 rs1786814 genotype and the risk of cardiotoxicity ( P = 0.03) with a highly significant difference in cumulative anthracycline dose >300 mg/m 2 and GG genotype and the risk of cardiotoxicity ( P < 0.001).
The ReHo values of the caudate showed an increasing trend from ReHo controls (0.81±0.06) to ReHo non-HE (0.96±0.08) to ReHo MHE (1.03±0.17) ( F = 25.317, P <0.001).
When hK6 specific activity was treated as a continuous variable, hazard ratios were closely similar to those of hK6 negative tumours (arbitrarily set at 1.00), although the slight increase in risk of disease progression (hazard ratio=1.005) was highly significant at P =0.001.