The difference between the two groups was highly significant (Mann-Whitney test, Z adj = 4.61, p < 0.001), thus showing that the silicon cover prevents olfactory detection and therefore learning.
Excerpts
Within-group analysis indicated that the improvement in the intervention group was highly significant ( p < 0.001), suggesting that regular, structured listening to therapeutic music effectively enhanced attention, memory, and executive functioning.
Differences between groups were considered significant if * p < 0.05, highly significant if ** p < 0.01 and extremely significant if *** p < 0.001.
The association between PPH and anaemia status at discharge from the hospital was highly significant (p<0.001), while there was no association between PPH and anaemia during pregnancy or at 6 weeks postpartum.
This revealed 3 genes that were highly significant differentially expressed (p > 0.001), 2 genes significant differentially expressed (p > 0.01) and 5 genes weakly significant differentially expressed (p > 0.05) ( Table 2 ) after multiple testing correction.
The results showed that the main effect of “group” was highly significant, F (2, 139) = 9.075, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.115 (90% CI [0.039, 0.194]), with clear increases in CG and EG2 cont as well as decreases in EG1 disc .
We found no significant difference for sex and age category (chi-square test, P -values 0.972 and 0.64) and highly significant differences in country, transmission mode, ethnicity, and viral subtype (chi-square test, all P -values < .001).
The logistic regression model was highly significant ( X 2 = 141.5, p < 0.001) and gave an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI [0.82–0.95], p < 0.001) ( Fig. 2 ).
Differences were considered as significant ( p < 0.05), very significant ( p < 0.01), and highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Chi-squared analysis revealed a highly significant ( P < 0.001) difference between total controls and treated groups.
Importantly, the interaction between the method and the source was also highly significant ( F = 11.90, p < 0.001).
= 1813) are both highly significant ( p << 0.001) so in each case the hypothesis of equality should be rejected.
A one-way related-means analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a highly significant effect of masker condition [F(2,10) = 58.07, p < 0.001].
Highly significant increases ( p < 0.001) in oestrus duration in queens in Treatments B, C and E, i.e., 27.1, 24.2 and 19.2 days, respectively, out of a maximum of 30 days, were all increased compared to the pre-treatment mean of 2.9 days and above the generally accepted mean of 7 days (range of 2 to 9 days) [ 18 , 19 ].
The model was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Patients admitted to the ICU had a discharge rate of 87%, and 13.1% died and this difference was highly significant ( P <0.001), with an OR of 33.3.
Comparison of pre- and postoperative scores showed that TaTME led to a highly significant decline in fecal function (Wexner score, p < 0.001; LARS score, p < 0.001), but the actual impairment was mild: the mean Wexner score remained in the lower quarter postoperatively (Fig. 2 ).
The change in tumor size was a highly significant predictor of the hazard for progression‐free survival in a joint tumor size—time to event model ( P < 0.001).
However, after everolimus treatment, there was a significant reduction in CECs number only in responders, resulting in a highly significant different numbers between responders and non-responders ( p < 0.001), demonstrating the biological activity of everolimus.
4a ), all three classification systems showed a highly significant association with the need for initial operative management (all p < 0.001) .
Additionally, the leakage rate of Tan IIA in TAN-TFSs showed a highly significant difference as early as 24 h ( p < 0.001), whereas the leakage rate of the PTF/TAN-TFSs system did not show a significant rise until 72 h. 3.3.
Waist circumference, as an important measure of abdominal obesity, was reduced by 4.2 cm in the treatment group compared to 0.4 cm in the control group; there was a highly significant interaction between time and treatment ( p < 0.001).
Serum PSA levels were markedly elevated in PCa-DM compared to PCa+DM and BPH, with the difference being highly significant (F = 58.95, p < 0.001).
Further, CRs of the RS-14 were between 18.427 and 29.099, reaching an extremely significant level ( p < .001).
Pearson’s correlation coefficient reveals a highly significant strong negative correlation between deployment and finishing time considering the past 25 years (r < −0.940, p < 0.001).