There was a highly significant and positive correlation between dose and baseline K-ARS scores (r=0.275, p=0.001) and also a positive correlation between dose and endpoint K-ARS scores (r=0.365, p=0.001).
Excerpts
The difference between controls and AD was nearly 6 kg for normal HGS, which was highly significant (p < 0.001).
Sample Type and Tumor Site Distribution Across FGFR4 Mutation Groups The distribution of sample types across FGFR4 mutation groups revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001, q < 0.001) shown in Figure 4 D.
This represents a reduction of 23.5%, which is highly significant ( P < .001).
Although the effect of chemical was found to be highly significant overall in terms of micronuclei induction (p < 0.001) a concentration of 20 ng/ml did not induce significant levels of micronuclei in binucleated cells (p = 0.060).
The likelihood-ratio chi-squared test for each model was highly significant (each P < 0.001).
The chi‐square test results further substantiate these findings, showing a highly significant difference across bed sizes ( χ 2 = 108.678, p < 0.001).
Across tertiles, there was a significant trend toward shorter cross-clamp time ( P < 0.001), cardiopulmonary bypass time ( P < 0.001), and hospital length of stay ( P = 0.005).
Not surprisingly, at 72 h, IR alone yielded a highly significant decrease in cell viability in infected T-cells, which was enhanced at 120 h (lane 1; p -value ≤ 0.001).
There were highly significant differences in head capsule width among the different latitudinal groups [P < 0.001, DF = (2, 543)] with the width increasing from north to south ( Table 1 ).
If we consider all the swimmers and say that quiescent muscles have zero spontaneous contractility, then the difference between the groups is highly significant ( P < 0.001).
There was a highly significant main meal effect ( P < 0.001) on duodenal pellet carbohydrate composition, with duodenal pellets from Broken comprising a 30.54 ± 6.47 mg per 100 mg (46%) lower proportion of starch than Intact-S (adj.
The difference between the PPV for trisomy 18 or 13 in the two groups was highly significant (Chi square p < 0.001).
Path C (Total) explored the total effect of HbA1c on Shoulder JPS, with a coefficient of 0.45 and a standard error of 0.07, revealing a highly significant relationship (t-value = 6.42, p-value < 0.001, confidence interval [0.32, 0.58]).
(b) In 85% of cases (17/20), correlations were higher in the seropositive group, a statistically highly significant preponderance ( P < 0.001, Wald test for single sample proportion).
This pattern in variation of Serine and Alanine counts between species was highly significant (Chi-square = 16.956, d.f. = 3, P ≤ 0.001) suggesting that there exists a linkage between the frequency variation of the two aa.
There was a highly significant main effect of Orientation (upright: M = 0.65 μV, s.d. = 0.10 μV; inverted: M = 0.13 μV, s.d. = 0.04 μV; F 1,15 = 20.60, p < 0.001), reflecting a large response reduction for the inverted faces, by a factor of 5.
The difference in effective doses between premedicated and unpremedicated children was highly significant (p<0.001).
Location relative to farm had no effect on chlorophyll (p = 0.13) but the effect of site was highly significant (p < 0.001).
When continuous eGDR data were divided into quartiles, the risk of MASLD associated with Q4 was 47% lower than Q1 (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.45–0.63), with a significant trend observed ( p < 0.001).
All patients with acute infarction on the presenting CT scan had poor outcome in our study, and hence, this factor was highly significant as a predictor of poor outcome (OR could not be calculated, P < 0.001).
In the multivariable GLMM analysis, switching regimens was associated with an increasing trend in TC (P < 0.001) and a decreasing trend in GLU (P = 0.013).
and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 was considered highly significant and p < 0.001 was considered very highly significant.
Patterns in genetic diversity Global population differentiation was highly significant using all SNPs (global F ST = 0.0068, 95% CI [0.005, 0.0105]; global genic differentiation test, p < 0.001), although clustering analyses with ADMIXTURE provided the strongest support for the model with a single underlying population (Fig C in S1 File ).
Moreover, even though all three experiments were carried out under the same greenhouse conditions, ANOVAs showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between the replications.