There was a highly significant difference found between study and control groups ( P < 0.001) for taking soy food products in a week.
Excerpts
The diet effect was highly significant on the fatty liver score ( p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney), while neither A (p = 0.32) nor T ( p = 0.19) genotype influenced the score.
The mean DCr/PCr was significantly higher in patients with anastomotic urinary leak (22.48 ± 28.99) compared to those without leak (1.63 ± 4.35), with a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) (Table 4 ).
Analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences between the profile groups in 1997 ( F = 164.69, P < .001), 2001 ( F = 51.85, P < .001), and 2007 ( F = 40.03, P < .001).
There was a highly significant dependence of RVP on age for the nonmatched DR group ( p < 0.001, slope = 0.52, 0.26–0.78).
The mean value among the groups showed a very highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) as shown in Table 2 .
The SMART heart package was statistically highly significant for knowledge and practice at P < 0.001 level.
Type-III ANOVA identified highly significant main effects of grazing (F = 62.67, P < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.68) and fertilization (F = 14.44, P < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.49), with a moderate interaction effect (F = 4.00, P = 0.029, partial η 2 = 0.21; Supplementary Table 1 ).
Results The P100 amplitude showed a significant difference among all treatment sessions with a decreasing trend in the study group after PRP ( P <0.001).
At baseline, the mean MASI score in the chemical peel group was 22.85 ± 4.35, which was substantially higher compared with the microneedling group (9.18 ± 4.10), and the between-group difference was highly significant (p < 0.001).
The differences in frequency of pathogen type between non-food animal and food animal associated EIZDs is statistically highly significant (Chi square: 18.2, p < 0.001).
Again, the differences were highly significant (p-value < 0.001).
In addition, Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity yielded a highly significant result (χ2 = 7238.63, df = 3321, p < 0.001), confirming that the observed correlation matrix was not an identity matrix and thus appropriate for structure detection via EFA (Table 2 ).
There was a highly significant difference between groups as determined by one-way ANOVA (F(14,54) = 22.477, p < 0.001).
Except for k = 1 and k = 1.25 the error of both methods shows a significant ( p < 0.05), for most values of k even highly significant ( p < 0.001) difference.
A further stratified analysis by quartiles of DNI, with the lowest quartile serving as the reference, revealed that the highest quartile was associated with HRs of 0.820 (0.697, 0.966) for all-cause mortality and 0.663 (0.465, 0.944) for cardiovascular mortality, both displaying a significant trend ( p < 0.001).
Similarly, total biomass showed highly significant positive associations with both Shannon ( r = 0.97, p < 0.001) and Simpson indices ( r = 0.95, p < 0.001).
The Effect of Leaf Crude Extracts of Podocarpus gracilis on BGL of Normoglycemic Mice Except at 0 hours and 4 hours after exposure, the overall change (i.e., lowering) of BGL was significant ( p < 0.01) at all periods at a dose of 5 mg/kg GCL compared to the baseline BGL, a maximum reduction of 30.5% was observed at the fourth hour, with a highly significant ( p < 0.001) reduction across all periods (0 hours).
Differential expression of the same three genes in these groups was illustrated in a comparison figure ( Figure 7B ), indicating a highly significant variation in IDO1 expression between high- and low-risk groups ( p < 0.001), with CA2 and TNF also showing significant differences ( p < 0.05).
The results revealed that the linear effect of time was highly significant for both the receptive (F = 89.484, p < 0.001, partial eta squared = 0.519) and productive (F = 36.368, p < 0.001, partial eta squared = 0.305) aspects.
However, it detected a significant trend deviation in the data series for January to June 2020, with a change-point in calendar week 12 ( p < 0.001, Fig. 5 B).
Also, a highly significant positive correlation was detected between iPTH and CXCL16 (r =-0.403, p<0.001) ( Figure 1 and Figure 2 ).
Retinopathy was present in 0.3% patients in group I while 31.4% patients in group II and again results were statistically highly significant (p<0.001).
Specifically, PTA was 7.8 ± 1.6 g at v 1 , 10.6 ± 1.8 g at v 2 and 12.5 ± 1.6 g at v 3 , with all differences being highly significant ( p < 0.001; Table A2 ).
The calculation of Pearson’s chi-square and the correlation coefficients according to Cramer’s V revealed a highly significant correlation between muscle free flaps and “Adherence” (0.496, p < 0.001), while fascio-cutaneous free flaps significantly correlated with “Good skin quality” (0.310, p = 0.004) and “Other” (0.231, p = 0.032).