On comparison of study variables according to dyslipidemia versus normal lipid levels, the lipid profile, including HDLc, LDLc, TC, and TG, revealed a highly significant difference (p-value <0.001) whereas many variables were not significantly different.
Excerpts
In addition, Box’s M test showed a highly significant result ( p < 0.001), indicating heterogeneity of covariance matrices across groups, thus violating the assumption of homoscedasticity ( Table 6 ).
RESULTS Cell type, culture method, and fatty acid treatment main effects There were highly significant differences (p<0.001) between IPA and BSC for AMPKα , C/EBPβ , CPT1β , PPARγ , and SCD gene expression ( Table 2 ).
23 Statistical significance was defined as P ≤ .05 (highly significant if P ≤ .001).
In the present study, [ Table 4 ] illustrates success rate of pre-operative asymptomatic cases is very high and statistically highly significant (Z = 5.43, P < 0.001).
Statistical analysis using an independent t-test revealed a highly significant difference between the groups (t = 9.02; p < 0.001), indicating elevated mucosal inflammatory response in formula-fed infants ( Table 1 ). 3.2.
When the parameter numbers between two models differed by 1, if ΔOFV >3.84, there was a significant difference ( P < 0.05); if ΔOFV >10.83, there was a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).
A strong correlation between number of drugs prescribed and total off-label drugs per prescription was noted, which is also highly significant (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.406 and r = 0.568 and P < 0.001) [ Table 2 ].
In triceps surae, CS and KHP3 follow a strong trend ( r 2 = 0.91, p < 0.001).
In addition, the difference in the total score of imagery is highly significant: for the athletes group, mean = 62.40, SD = 7.13; for the controls group, mean = 44.02, SD = 10.74; t = −9.87, p < 0.001.
Significant differences are indicated using the standard Michelin Guide scale (* p < 0.05, significant; ** p < 0.01, highly significant; *** p < 0.001, extremely significant).
A highly significant effect of Change was observed, F (1, 68) = 15.31, p <.001, η 2 p =.18, indicating faster responses when color was repeated (M = 863.92, SD = 79.72) compared with when changed (M = 877.85, SD = 79.617), and neither significant effects of Preceding Distractor Value, F (2,136) = 2.16, p =.119, η 2 p =.03, nor a significant interaction, F (2,136) =.54, p =.581, η 2 p <.01.
Statistical testing was highly significant (χ 2 = 109.21, P < 0.001; Table 6 ).
Upon testing the distribution of different B-cell subsets in POAG patients, there was a highly significant increase in the frequencies of the DN B-cell subset (CD19+CD27−IgD−) and the naïve B-cell subset (CD19+CD27−lgD+) ( p < 0.001) for all POAG patients, while a significant decrease in the unswitched memory B-cell subset (CD19+CD27+IgD+) ( p < 0.001) was found in this group as compared with the control group.
As shown in Figure 2 a, adding ifenprodil resulted in a highly significant decrease in 53BP1 foci (1.6 ± 0.2, p < 0.001) when compared to the Glu treatment alone, whereas adding NBQX led to a significant lower decrease of the number of foci compared to ifenprodil (1.95 ± 0.16, p = 0.026).
The analyses found that there is a highly significant difference in social presence between introverts and extroverts t (44) = −3.23, p = .001 and a highly significant difference in sense of community between introverts and extroverts t (127) = −3.83, p < .001.
CD206 expression had a cut-off index of 0.581 for DFS, with a highly significant correlation (P<0.001), indicating that higher percentages of CD206 expression were associated with poorer DFS.
The root-to-shoot ratio increased under stress, indicating an increased partitioning of biomass towards root as an adaptive mechanism. Genetic variation of traits under water stress and recovery conditions In Table 1 , the analysis of variance showed that there was highly significant variation ( P < 0.001) among the genotypes for all the traits under stress conditions.
Dunnett’s test yielded t-values of 12.84 (Group A) and 14.41 (Group B), both highly significant (p < 0.001).
Table 2 revealed highly significant differences in all 11 traits analyzed through ANOVA at the p < 0.001 level, with h 2 exceeding 0.7.
The residual analysis was highly significant for the initial conditions ( r 2 = 0.638, n = 14, p < 0.001).
The global analysis confirmed this pattern, with a highly significant Chi-square test indicating strong overall heterogeneity (χ2 = 1958.4, df = 405, p < 0.001).
With regards to individual subcortical abnormalities (which make up the composition of the BDS), the cerebellum showed the highest incidence of abnormality with dysplasia being present in 49/67 (73.13%) of animals scored and was highly significant compared to control animals ( p < 0.001).
Of these factors, the correlation between baseline age and change in axial length was observed to be highly significant ( P < .001), meaning that younger patients exhibit faster axial elongation than older patients.
The Chi-square analysis revealed a highly significant difference among the three groups in the number of attempts required for successful SAB placement in obese patients ( P < 0.001) [ Table 3 ].