Intubation time was shorter and the use of on-demand sedation/analgesia was less for two-person compared to one-person technique - both comparisons highly significant (p < 0.001) (table 2 ).
Excerpts
The mean value among the groups showed a very highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) as shown in Table 2 .
Among Chinese pregnant women, the mediating role of FSA remained highly significant and robust for TC (β = 0.182, p < 0.001), personal hygiene (β = 0.160, p < 0.001), and CC control (β = 0.198, p < 0.001), confirming attitude’s consistent influence on translating knowledge into these practices.
We saw the same results when comparing the ascending aorta with the false lumen, all comparisons showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).
Results Multivariate analysis indicated that an elevated TSH level was a highly significant predictor for 30-day survival (HR = 0.743, 95% CI: 0.629–0.878, P < 0.001) and 90-day survival (HR = 0.807, 95% CI: 0.717–0.909, P < 0.001).
We detected highly significant negative phenotypic correlations between dry matter and total carotenoid contents (− 0.31, p < 0.001); mean CMD severity and harvest index (r = − 0.14, p < 0.001); and apical pubescence and CGM severity (r = − 0.27, p < 0.001).
The difference in values and prevalence between MS patients and HC was highly significant ( Figure 1A ; Mann–Whitney rank sum test: p <0.001).
However, the study group exhibited lower SAS and SDS scores than the control group, with a highly significant statistical difference ( P < 0.001, Table 3 ).
The peripheral blood and the BM findings are illustrated in (table 2 , Figure 1 ), TLC is highly significant decrease in FA patients and in AAA (p < 0.001).
Moreover, one-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant trend of group effect [ F (2,72) = 15.4, p < 0.001] on the three different types of eccentricity. 3.2.
Only highly significant correlations ( p <0.001) were considered for this analysis.
The models are highly significant for each year from 2011 to 2014 ( p <0.001 for the F − test of model fit).
There were moderate to strong highly significant correlations between BDEFS Overall scores and scores on the subcomponents (all p -values < 0.001).
Results: A highly significant ( P value < 0.001) statistical difference was seen in the oral carriage rate of Candida species between the two groups with values more in the study group (60.75 ± 71.43) than in controls (1.62 ± 2.22).
The differences were highly significant (25.5±3.9 vs . 21.5±4.1 mmHg, P <0.001, Fig. 6 ).
The correlation between the measurements of SFCT performed by two independent observers was highly significant ( r = 0.96; p < 0.001).
Paired samples t-tests revealed highly significant differences in MEP ( p = 0.001) and significant differences in FEV1/FVC ( p = 0.026) for the testosterone use and no testosterone use groups.
LPS), very significant (##, ** p < 0.01), and highly significant (###, *** p < 0.001). 3.
6 ), DAS and branching habit classification were highly significant factors (p < 0.001).
When comparing positions independently, the greatest group differences occurred in conditions P1 (eyes open and firm surface) and P3 (eyes closed and firm surface), both showing highly significant differences (p < 0.001) favoring the control group, with large effect sizes (d > 1.88) ( Figure 3 ).
P-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant (*) if P < 0.05, as very significant (**) if P < 0.01, and as extremely significant (***) if P < 0.001.
Statistical analysis by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a highly significant effect of the mouse strain and time point after infection on the viral load in all intestinal sections examined ( P < 0.001 in each case; Supplementary Table 1 ).
Statistical analysis indicates that this belt shows a highly significant widening trend with increasing annual precipitation ( R 2 = 0.724, p < 0.001, n = 13).
Fire recovery strategy was highly significant ( P < 0.001), with post‐fire obligate reseeders being 85.7% amphistomatous and obligate resprouters 36.8% amphistomatous.
This model was highly significant in predicting vowel category (short vs. long) based on the duration of each vowel, Estimate = 0.004, Error = 0.0001, z = 37.66, p <0.001.