By the end of the study (Day 42) the decrease in PI-NRS scores for the IP group was maximal (↓61.32%) and highly significant ( p <0.001) in comparison to the placebo group (↑2.47%).
Excerpts
Administration of 3-NP alone shows motor abnormalities, decreased locomotor counts, loss of memory in EPM, decreased motor coordination in beam walking test, decreased hanging latency on hanging wire test and even 3-NP alone treatment resulted in highly significant ( p < 0.001) reduction in body weight.
A Mann–Whitney U test reveals that age and height exhibit highly significant distributional differences between non-cancer and cancer cohorts ( p < 0.001 for each), consistent with known epidemiological risk factors.
Data provided by the statistical authority with regards to deaths from the total of respiratory diseases (ICD9 range: 460–519) for the 21-year period 1989–2009, revealed the existence of a decreasing trend ( p -value < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).
The increase was more evident in the 100 mg/kg ICA group compared with the 25 mg/kg ICA group, with a highly significant difference (*** p < 0.001).
Remarkably, the correlations of the GCGN–alanine index became highly significant upon the high protein intake for 6 weeks for IHL (ρ = 0.652, p < 0.001) ( Figure 2B ) and for insulin sensitivity (ρ = 0.644, p < 0.001) ( Figure 2A ).
There was a highly significant negative correlation between the nucleated cell count of the reinfused marrow and the period of neutropenia (P<0.001) and a significant negative correlation The Natural Killer (NK) activity of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and whole blood from patients with malignant lymphoma, prior to treatment, was found to be significantly depressed when compared with controls.
Durations of chest tube drainage in study group was less than of control group which was highly significant (p value = 0.001).
However, when the study group was compared with control group, it was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The mean ostium height was 28.88 mm (SD=4.97) in the absence of concha bullosa and 30.58 mm (SD=4.47) in its presence, with a highly significant difference (P<0.001).
Differences in utilities between the two instruments became highly significant in less severe levels (1 and 2) (p-value < 0.001) (Table 2 ).
The associated p-values for all pairs were highly significant (p < 0.001), suggesting a substantial improvement in the condition.
Large restaurants showed highly significant differences (ANOVA: p < 0.001), with both FW2 and FW3 significantly exceeding FW1 (Tukey’s HSD: p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between FW2 and FW3 (Tukey’s HSD: p = 0.959), suggesting that management focuses on both types.
The differences in DM disappearance were highly significant ( p < 0.001) between dietary treatments from day 10–18 where it was higher in the LCF litters.
From the low level to the high level of the TyG index, the incidence of MACCE events, mortality and mRS score of 4–6 had an increasing trend ( P < 0.001, Table 2 ).
The OR for higher TG levels was 2.742 (95% CI, 1.595–4.713), signifying a highly significant relationship ( P < .001).
Statistical analysis revealed that the effect of the dose was highly significant ( p <0.001).
In addition, group (D) results showed highly significant values than other groups with lower mean values except for UC-MSCs and group (C) (p<0.001).
Similar to the ERG data, the central foveal thickness and mean retinal thickness in the right and left eyes of patients showed highly significant correlations (r 2 = 0.45, p < 0.001; and r 2 = 0.71, p < 0.001, respectively), and we therefore used only the SD-OCT data obtained from the right eye of all subjects for further analysis.
The significance level was defined as follows: p ≥ 0.05 not significant, p < 0.05 significant, p < 0.01 highly significant and p < 0.001 most highly significant.
Results Hospital admission was determined in 81.2% of all ED patients ( n = 28,633); 54.7% of inpatients ( n = 15,652) and 0.97% of outpatient cases ( n = 64) met the criteria for multimorbidity and the age difference between them was highly significant (68.7/60.8 years; p < 0.001).
Readiness to quit had small but significant positive correlations with identified regulation for each of the substances measured (rs = 0.118 – 0.262, all p s < 0.05), and small but highly significant negative correlations with external regulation for alcohol ( r = −0.119, p < 0.001) and stimulants ( r = −0.178, p < 0.001).
The published results showed that, compared with placebo, everolimus showed a highly significant improvement in radiologically defined PFS using both investigator (6.9 vs. 2.8 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.54; P < 0.001) and independent reviewers’ assessment (10.6 vs. 4.1 months, HR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.27-0.47; P < 0.001).[ 2 ] Based on these data, the US FDA approved everolimus for the treatment of appropriately selected postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.
Postmenopausal women showed an increasing trend in the prevalence of MetS as the number of live-birth pregnancies increased ( P < 0.001), with women in women with 4 and more live births having the highest prevalence of MetS ( P < 0.05) (Table 3 ).
In contrast, the population × temperature interaction was highly significant (χ 2 (12) = 78.91, p < 0.001), revealing distinct population-specific thermal response patterns.