Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Intra-herd analysis revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in anti-PRRSV Abs titers in H1 between sampling time points; this was attributed to the 100% seropositivity detected at delivery in both PS and MS.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, the difference in mean numbers of MTase fusion molecules in infected cells and cells that withstood the infection (6219 ± 326 and 4400 ± 178, respectively) was highly significant ( P < 0.001) and led to a shift of the MTase to REase ratio in productively infected cells to higher values compared to cells that withstood the infection (1.75 ± 0.123 versus 1.02 ± 0.04).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the Atkins dieters, there were highly significant shifts (p < 0.001) in the percentage (%) energy derived from all macronutrients from baseline to 2 months, as follows: 11% increase in protein energy (95% C.I. -13.7, -9.1); 10% increase in energy from fat (95% C.I. -24.1, -16.3); 29% fall in CHO energy (95% C.I. 24.7, 32.6) and a 3% fall in energy derived from alcohol (95% C.I. 1.28, 4.76).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The mean length-to-width ratio varied from 1.520 -+ 0.376 SD to 1.858 +- 0.678 and always showed a highly significant increase (P < 0.001) over nonsheared controls (1.111 --_ 0.143 to 1.187 - 0.250).
Macrophage deformability and phagocytosis.
J Cell Biol · 1977 · PMC2111563
highly significantP ≤0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For instance, as is shown in Table 1 , the two-way rANO-VAs with repeated measure “Time” and independent factor “Strain” always yielded a highly significant main effect of factor “Strain,” as well as a highly significant main effect of interaction between this factor and “Time” (eg, P ≤0.001 for sleep measure in any of these rANOVAs).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Further, all 2-way interactions were highly significant [Opacity × Orientation: F 1,297 = 40.2, p < 0.001, η p = 0.12; Stimulus × Opacity: F 1,297 = 68.2, p < 0.001, η p = 0.19; Stimulus × Orientation: F 1,297 = 896.3, p < 0.001, η p = 0.75], and also the Stimulus × Opacity × Orientation interaction was significant [ F 1,297 = 7.9, p < 0.01, η p = 0.03].
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A two-way MANOVA on log 10 -transformed R, G and B luminances of the 6 colour characters indicated that habitat, locality and habitat-locality interaction were all highly significant (habitat, Pillai’s Trace = 0.450, F 6,201 = 27.44, P < 0.001; locality, Pillai’s trace = 0.479, F 18,609 = 6.43, P < 0.001; interaction, Pillai’s trace =0.285, F 18,609 = 3.55, P < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The moderate‐high heritability obtained (h 2 = 0.579 ± 0.180), highly significant despite the error associated with the wild scenario inspected ( p < 0.001), supports a genetic component underlying resistance/tolerance to P. olseni i .
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When estimating the density of TH- and DAT-reactive fibers in the rat striatum, the two different doses of 6-OHDA resulted in highly significant unilateral decrease in the striatal fiber density at both 2 and 4 weeks post-lesion as compared to the intact rat striatum (one-way ANOVA ( P < 0.001, F 4,22 = 32.564 (TH) and F 4,22 = 52.435 (DAT)) and Tukey post hoc test, n = 4 to 5 per group) (Figure 2 B,C; representative pictures in Figure 1 C,D).