The effect of the complications is highly significant (p<0.001).
Excerpts
A highly significant correlation (r = 0.59, P < 0.001) was found.
The difference between the ap-Gal4 and ap-Gal4/+; UAS-myc-fry-GFP flies was highly significant (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test).
Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 514.4, df = 210, p < .001), indicating some relationships existed between variables, which makes the correlation matrix suitable for factor analysis.
However, relative to spleen cells of guinea pigs sensitized to group C antigens or CFA in buffer, the response to group A streptococcal sensitization was highly significant (P < 0.001) in terms of target cell lysis.
In the U/S measurement at 120 min median ACSA values were 0.1 cm 2 and 0.8 cm 2 for intermittently and continuously fed neonates, respectively, and this difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).
In addition, SSS, WPI and VAS showed a statistically highly significant direct correlation with Lead and Chromium ( p < 0.001), and a significant direct correlation with Cadmium ( p = 0.007, 0.003, 0.004 respectively) (Table 5 ).
At the interpersonal level, family support was also highly significant (β = 0.841, p < 0.001, OR = 2.32), indicating that adolescents who received encouragement from family were over twice as likely to be more physically active.
An increasing trend was observed in CO data until the 16th h (P < 0.001), and then CO dropped significantly below the level of the sham-operated animals at the 20th h (P < 0.001).
The analysis of variance also showed a highly significant ( p -value ≤ 0.001) effect of environment, and genotype by environment factors on the amylose content.
We did in fact note a highly significant inverse correlation ( Fig. 6D , Rho = −0.29, P <0.001).
As main effects, harvest season and rootstock were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) for TSS over the five seasons, but no significant interaction between these factors was observed ( Table 4 ).
A p < 0.05 indicated significant (*), p < 0.01 indicated highly significant (**), and p < 0.001 indicated extremely highly significant (***) difference. 3.
Al, the predominant acidic cation, showed an increasing trend of solubility at S1 till the end of incubation ( p < 0.001).
AIM Visual Acuity A two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of group [ F (1, 114) = 197.1, P < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.63] because of lower acuities for PwA.
TCD showed a decreasing trend with the increasing N:P ratio (Fig. 1 c), which had a significant difference among the treatments ( p = 0.001, Table 1 ), while the RCD of C. filispica showed a positive correlation and increased ( r = 0.363, Table 1 ).
In the eccentric phase, the magnitude r was almost perfect for RKF (0.907–0.961), for RKE, LKE and LKF it was very large (0.875–0.962), all results were highly significant ( p = 0.001).
There was a declining trend of warfarin initiation over the study period (23.9% to 5.4%, a decrease of 18.5%; P <0.001), and an increasing trend of DOAC initiation (5.5% to 33.6%, an increase of 28.1%; P <0.001).
The associated factors with the prevalence of allergic rhinitis were carpet (odds ratio [OR]: 1.79, p = 0.001), residential area (marginally significant), duration of residence (OR: 1.09, p < 0.001).
Serum PSA levels were markedly elevated in PCa-DM compared to PCa+DM and BPH, with the difference being highly significant (F = 58.95, p < 0.001).
About 22.50% of patients led sedentary lifestyle as compared to 7.5% in controls, the difference being statistically highly significant ( p = 0.001) in the study by Daulatabad D et al .[ 14 ] The duration of complaints noted was 13-24 months in 40% of patients, closely followed by 3-12 months in 37.5%, 25- 60 months in 17.5% and more than 60 months in 5% of cases.
Daisy et al., in a prospective case-control study conducted on 105 consecutive children admitted to a burn unit in Bangladesh, noted a highly significant association between burns and “cooking equipment in the kitchen within reach of children (P < 0.001)” [ 18 ].
Forced swim test In this test [ Figure 2 ], after intraperitoneal administration of cilostazol (20 mg/kg) there was extremely significant decrease in immobility time (70.66±2.27; P <0.001) as compared to control (123.33±9.44).
The high-risk group exhibited a strikingly higher 30-day mortality rate of 28.0% as opposed to the 1.7% in the low-risk group, with a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).
In both study 1 and study 2, a highly significant correlation of both independent measures was found with a mean Pearson's coefficient of r = 0.93 ( P < 0.001) and r = 0.81 ( P < 0.01), respectively.