Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Importantly, in a separate follow-up behavioral experiment, where participants provided verbal descriptions of the conceptual structure of the task after each learning block (see Supplemental Results and Supplemental Experimental Procedures ), the correlation between probe performance and task structure descriptions was highly significant (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) and remained significant (p < 0.05) after the effect of learning trial performance had been partialled out (r = 0.55, p < 0.001).
a decreasing trendP <.0010.0× alphagold
At the time of RPM, the level of ER visits increased by 14.58 (95% CI 10.70-18.46) visits per month per 1000 beneficiaries and had a decreasing trend with 0.26 (95% CI −0.32 to −0.20) fewer visits per month per 1000 people ( P <.001 for all outcomes) in the treatment compared with the control.
highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results showed improvement in plaque index, which showed a mean difference of 1.78±0.51 with P <0.001 between baseline and 1 month, which was highly significant; and at 3 months, the mean difference was 1.75±0.50 with P <0.001 [ Table 2 ], which was highly significant.
Aloe vera: Nature's soothing healer to periodontal disease.
J Indian Soc Periodontol · 2011 · PMC3200013
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Primary outcome Vertical skeletal measurements According to the analysis of the pre- and post-treatment 3D cephalometric measurements, a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) was observed in the angle between the mandibular and SN planes, which increased by a mean of 0.82 ± 1.37°.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Despite this functional importance, in our study, age emerged as a highly significant independent predictor of HCC in the fully adjusted multivariable logistic regression model (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07–1.13, p < 0.001).
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Based on these results, we retained three NTB variables (semantic fluency, immediate word list recall, and delayed word list recall) that were highly significant predictors (all p < .001) with excellent fit (Max‐rescaled R ‐square = 0.72, Hosmer–Lemeshow Goodness‐of‐fit (GOF) χ 2 = 8.25, p = .41; Max‐rescaled R‐square = 0.66, Hosmer–Lemeshow GOF χ 2 = 8.17, p = .41) for dementia and CI (dementia status and CIND status combined), respectively, within the ADAMS data.