Also highly significant (P < 0.001) but more moderate values of correlations (from 0.39 to 0.56) were observed between WG and PC with LES and hematocrit level (HEMA), and between HEMA and LES.
Excerpts
In the post-treatment, highly significant differences were absorbed in both evaluation methods ( P < 0.001).
The general effect of % of body weight increase between groups was found to be very highly significant (p < 0.001).
Clinical parameters such as PI and CAL were highly significant in Group C ( P < 0.001).
The partial correlation of log stool weight and log D (while controlling for L) which determines whether D influences the association of L with stool weight, is highly significant (r=0.41, P<0.001), con- firming that L alone is not as strongly associated with stool weight as L/D.
The differences are highly significant for the MTF features ( t ( 154 ) = − 9.122018 , p < 0.001 ) and the GASF features ( t ( 154 ) = − 8.411133 p < 0.001 ) and significant for the GADF features ( t ( 154 ) = − 3.351624 , p = 0.001 ).
The difference between the slopes was highly significant (F = 31.50, DFn = 1, DFd = 26, p < 0.001) ( Figure 6 ).
When group B and Group C were compared at the first evaluation with their baseline scores, 0.4% (mean difference = 0.01 ± 0.05) and 2.3% (mean difference = 0.03 ± 0.03) reduction in plaque scores was observed, respectively, which was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The analysis yielded an index of 0.84 in concert with a highly significant Bartlett Test of Sphericity (χ 2 = 1039.00, df = 153, p < 0.001).
Interaction between breed and month of age had highly significant (p<0.001) effect on the mRNA expression.
A highly significant overall effect was found on the mPANAS negative affect scale (Wald = 10.334, df = 1, P =0.001) and the Emotional Abuse subscale of ETISR-SF (Wald = 8.57, df = 1, P = 0.003).
There are two important differences between the two groups regarding the prediction model of ED: the model explains the higher ED variance in psoriasis patients (35%) when compared to healthy persons (19%), and the contribution of expressive suppression is moderately significant in healthy persons ( p < 0.05), and quite significant in psoriasis patients ( p < 0.001) ( Table 7 ).
On the contrary, a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) was observed between the p 35SGFP -transformed protoplast groups and the WT group or the pPr HSP17.6aGFP -transformed protoplast groups ( Figure 2 ).
All coefficients were highly significant ( p < 0.001 ).
Highly significant improvements in VAS scores at rest and with activity ( p <0.001) were evident.
For the DAOM genotype, ANOVA tests revealed highly significant between-cluster differences across all node-level metrics (degree: F = 1107, P < .001; average path length: F = 6734, P < .0001; clustering coefficient: F = 482.4, P < .001; betweenness centrality: F = 8.2, P < .001.For the C2 genotype, cluster membership significantly affected degree ( F = 719.2, P < .001), average path length ( F = 1291, P < .001), and clustering coefficient ( F = 436.2, P < .001), but not betweenness centrality ( F = 2, P = .089).
Pairwise F ST values indicate that Ha1 has highly significant genetic differentiation relative to all other sites ( p = .001), and Ha2 has significant genetic differentiation from all sites ( p ≤ .009) except Ha10 ( p = .148), which is the closest geographically (Table 2 ).
Results During the study period, altogether 19 550 DEs were reported, and the annual number of error reports showed a decreasing trend ( n = 3 913 in 2015 vs. n = 2 117 in 2020, RR 0.54, p < 0.001).
Significance levels were set at p > 0.05 (not significant), 0.05 ≥ p > 0.01 (slightly significant), 0.01 ≥ p > 0.001 (significant) and p ≤ 0.001 (highly significant).
The test showed that the full model is highly significant for both analyses compared to the additive only model [detailed coordinate system: χ ( 50 ) 2 = 234.54, p < 0.001, V = 0.52; simple coordinate system: χ ( 50 ) 2 = 287.39; p < 0.001, V = 0.47], which in turn is also highly significant compared to the null model [detailed coordinate system: χ ( 51 ) 2 = 220.14, p < 0.001, V = 0.45; simple coordinate system: χ ( 51 ) 2 = 6832.17, p < 0.001, V = 2.55].
Based on the results of the Cochran–Armitage test for trend, there was an increasing trend in ICR between the three groups ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).
ANOVA analysis revealed that temperature exerted a highly significant effect on archaeal abundance (F = 45.32, p < 0.001); Fe 3+ concentration also had a significant influence (F = 18.67, p < 0.01), whereas the effect of NO 2 − was relatively weak and not statistically significant (F = 3.21, p > 0.05).
The differences between the two periods investigated in the present study were highly significant in all the measures, i.e., vigorous and moderate physical activity, walking, and total physical activity ( p < 0.001).
There was a significant trend that treatment in asymptomatic patients increases with colony count in urine culture (p< 0.001).
conducted a large safety database review and found a highly significant increase in the incidence of myocarditis in combination nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy (0.27% vs. 0.06%; p<0.001; 5 fatal events vs. 1) ( 40 ).