Excerpts

We ran the analysis looking at gender differences in G6PD levels in both cut-off value of 5.7 and 8.05 U/g Hb for cord and peripheral blood samples and we found that there were equally highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in the levels between males and females in both samples (Table 2 ).

However, after 16 weeks of co-administration of the drugs, blood glucose of mice was significantly reduced ( p < 0.01, p < 0.05), and blood glucose of the Met group showed a significant trend of reduction ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 1C ); the administration did not affect the body weight of db/db mice ( Figure 1D ).

The regression coefficient for relevance amounted to 0.95 and was highly significant (t-value 19.2, p < 0.001), the correlation coefficient accounting for 0.89 hinting at a strong relationship.

2 ). The differences among the zones were highly significant ( F (2,15) = 11.95, p < 0.001).

Additionally, a highly significant interaction of diet and sex was detected (diet:sex: F 2,41 = 7.866, p = 0.001).

Despite the effect of sex on PPVT scores in the group of first affected siblings, an analysis of the subgroup of 214 sib pairs comprised of only males demonstrated that the effect of autism birth order on PPVT scores is still highly significant (t(213) = 3.370, p = .001).

Results Genotype/breed effect was highly significant ( P < 0.001) for all hair and cashmere properties and quality characteristics, except; curl degree, elongation at break cortical cell dimensions (length and diameter) which was different at ( P = 0.033), ( P = 0.032), ( P = 0.148) and ( P = 0.559), respectively, but no effects were detected for sex or interaction between breed and sex ( P > 0.05) (Supplementary File 1 , Tables S2 : S8 ).

Weight-loss behaviors demonstrated a highly significant association with gender (χ 2 = 21.300, p < 0.001).

The (fixed effects) Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel approach 5 revealed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) mortality difference, with a risk ratio of 5.34 (95% confidence intervals 4.84–5.90) in COVID-positive ACS patients.

aeruginosa showing highly significant variation ( p < 0.001) and S. aureus and B. subtilis also significant ( p < 0.05).

The regression model was highly significant, F (11, 995) = 12.997, P < 0.001.

These differences among the stone composition groups were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

At the final harvest, LMF was 0.46 for the high-nutrient plants, and 0.31 for the low-nutrient plants, representing a substantial and statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) difference in allocation to leaves.

Again a highly significant main effect of Target-Valence confirmed that positive pictures were rated as more arousing than neutral ones ( F 1;67 = 145.78, p < .001; control group: t 33 = -9.72, p < .001; depletion group: t 34 = -7.26, p < .001).

The majority of study cohort comprised of patients with AVNRT, and they were the ones who showed statistically highly significant (p < 0.001) acute success rate of 91%, compared to 69% for those with accessory bypass tract mediated AV reentry and 67% for those requiring AV nodal ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) further revealed highly significant differences in community structure among the different zones of the Xiaolangdi Reservoir (R = 0.7466, p < 0.001; Figure S4A ).

A highly significant association between amblyopia and mothers' BMI was seen (p < 0.001).

As shown in Figure 4B , five module–trait relationships (indicated with red underlines) were highly significant ( P value < 0.001) ( Figure 5B ).

A significant trend ( χ 2 = 70.328, P <0.001) was identified that showed a growing proportion of rural cases.

The highest efficacy was recorded at the highest concentration of 2.0 mg mL −1 after 48 h where a highly significant difference between the treatment and control at P < 0.001 was recorded against the motility of both strains of C. elegans .

All of the correlations were positive and highly significant ( P < 0.001), especially for those among the lengths of limb bones.

Variance Analysis for Yields The combined analysis of variance ( Table 1 ) revealed highly significant differences ( p ≤ 0.001, p ≤ 0.01) for yield per plot among different factors: locations, genotypes, and the genotype–location (G × E) interaction.

By contrast, in subjects without renal arterial calcification, a significant trend in the prevalence of arterial calcification according to perirenal fat thickness was found ( P <0.001 for all in the crude analysis) ( Table 3 ).

Here, we found highly significant ( p < 0.001) improvement in all areas and a large effect size > 0.5 with Spearman’s ρ ranging between 0.6 and 0.7, which we calculated as our measure of effect size.

The results of the multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model are highly significant (Chi-square = 17.653, p < 0.001).