affect ecological momentary assessment healthy eating physical activity stress Peer‐Mentoring Team‐Program (Line A) of the German Psychology Society European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme ERC‐StG‐2014 639445 Austrian Science Fund (FWF) I 02130‐B27 Physical activity relating to subsequent stress and affect As can be seen in Figure 2 , more physical activity was associated with less subsequent stress (β 10 = −.104, SE = .021, p < .001) when controlling for stress level at time t −1, which was a highly significant predictor for stress at t itself (β 20 = .393, SE = .036, p < .001).
Excerpts
Difference between two framework fabrication methods were highly significant ( P <.001); Gap of working model showed significantly smaller gap compare to impression in MG, CG, and AOTG.
The risk variable was highly significant (p<0.001); as was years of experience (p = 0.004); but 2D∶4D was not (p = 0.911). 2D∶4D was, however, correlated with risk in a simple regression (n = 47, r = −.43, p = 0.001.
Close to two thirds (63%) of the probes showing DE-between females of the two strains had lower expression in WL females, which is a highly significant bias (χ 2 , d.f. = 1, P < 0.001).
Upon examining the association of TAMs with OSCC, it was observed that, intriguingly, the number of TAMs decreased with increasing OSCC grade, demonstrating a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) [ Table 1 ; Figures 1 and 2 ].
Doing so left our primary results substantively unchanged, with all Condition × Time point interactions remaining highly significant ( P < 0.001). † Here, we assume that the effect of condition depends linearly on log-income.
The correlation between pulmonary RAI uptake score and treatment response remained highly significant (Spearman’s ρ = 0.664, p < 0.001).
The correlation between final adherence and MPR was highly significant (Spearman-Rho test; r = 0.62; p ≤ 0.001).
The correlation between our study sample and the population in each state is highly significant (Spearman rank R = 0.87, p < 0.001).
3b ), supported by a highly significant interaction between ocularity (monocular/binocular) and layers (superficial/middle/deep) in a two-way repeated measures (rm) ANOVA (F(2,18) = 19.068, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.680).
The association between parity and knowledge of SP was highly significant ( X 2=14.1, df=4, P<0.001). 3.6 Knowledge of SP among pregnant women and various educational backgrounds Knowledge about SP correlated with education level: Illiterate pregnant women (no primary education), 37 (8%); primary education, 67 (15%), and 187 (42%) had secondary education.
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed a highly significant separation in overall survival between the two groups (P < 0.001), demonstrating that the RSF-based risk model has robust discriminatory ability for predicting survival outcomes in DLBCL ( Figure 2G ; Supplementary Figures S2H-J ).
The results regarding Model 2 indicated that the context × relationship approach was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Furthermore, all correlations were at a highly significant level ( p < 0.001), except for SSR5.
There was a highly significant linear relationship between the δ 13 C values of Protomystides sp. and the E . laminata individuals to which they were attached across all collections (p < 0.001) and within a single collection (p = 0.01), although this relationship was not significant for δ 15 N and δ 34 S.
This was confirmed by an ANOVA analysis which showed a main effect of valence ( df = 1, F = 18.05, p < 0.001), no effect of semantic category ( df = 1, F = 2.94, p > 0.1), and contrary to the other emotional parameters, a highly significant interaction between semantic valence and semantic category ( df = 1, F = 35.6, p < 0.001).
In addition, the time factor had a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001), and a significant main effect of dose was also found ( p < 0.001).
However, these values are not fully consistent with those shown in Table 4 for Pearson correlation coefficients, as despite they hold a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) for breeding values for milk yield and dry matter, it is not high (around 0.061–0.151, respectively), what accounts for the fact that more than linear, this correlation may present a nonlinear nature.
Region of interest analysis Both, left and right precentral cortex showed a highly significant reduction of the cortical thickness in ALS (left: t(26) = 3.76, p < 0.001; right: t(26) = 3.81, p < 0.001).
show highly significant differences across all stages of DR ( p < 0.001), reinforcing the link between lower vitamin D levels and DR progression.
The spatial error parameter was high and highly significant (λ = 0.92, p < 0.001; Table 3 ), indicating strong spatial structure in the error term.
Maximal grip was a highly significant predictor of visual memory ( n = 1162; t = −3.7, coeff = −0.155, SE = 0.042, P < .001) and reaction time ( t = −5.5, coeff = −0.049, SE = 0.009, P < .001).
The results clearly show that both cryopreservation methods caused highly significant changes in cytoskeletal structures of embryos, especially in tubulin, actin, and nucleus as compared to non-vitrified embryos (p<0.001).
For the third covariate, control event rate, the negatively sloped relationship is highly significant ( P = 0.001) and is slightly steeper after correcting for dependence of the effect measure on the control event rate, increasing confidence in true effect modification.
The prognostic values, AUROC (mean; 95% CI) and Cox‐risk‐ratio (mean; 95% CI) of FibroTest for the prediction of 10 year‐liver‐related survivals in 1079 patients with NAFLD were highly significant ( P < 0.001) 0.941 (0.905‐0.978), 1224 (264‐5613), vs random.