Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There is a highly significant association between article type and journal category (χ 2 = 527.15, P < 0.001), with collaborative articles being predominantly published in nonplastic surgery journals (n = 1534; 77.4%), whereas noncollaborative articles were almost exclusively published in plastic surgery journals (n = 2803; 99.6%).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
increasingly complex non-linearities of model stage), stopping at the number of knots that gave the best fitting model (based on linear mixed effect model comparisons, as implemented in the lmerTest package).There was a highly significant main effect of ROI ( F = 330.7, p < 0.001) reflecting the fact that overall model fit decreases as one moves from EVC to pVTC to PrC (which could be because of differences in the level of noise in the fMRI data across these ROIs).
highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In a previous study on the LiTOX strain, we have validated the reliability of mRNA sequencing pooled data for inferring population allelic frequencies on 269 SNP: the correlation between allelic frequencies obtained from pooled mRNA sequencing (180 pooled larvae) and individual genotypes (N = 28 individuals) obtained using a DNA Illumina GoldenGate array was highly significant (P <0.001, r =0.85) [ 51 ].
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Our results indicated that the majority of never-tested MSM did not use condoms in the last sex act (56.9%), doubled the percentage of those who had tested in the past 12 months (29.7%) and those who tested more than 12 months ago (21.6%); the difference between three groups were highly significant (χ 2 = 25.10, p < 0.001).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant main effects of PGR type (df = 2, Wald χ2 = 20538.041, P < 0.001; df = 2, Wald χ2 = 75.219, P < 0.001; df = 2, Wald χ2 = 1961.779, P < 0.001) and PGR concentration (df = 3, Wald χ2 = 7854.678, P < 0.001; df = 3, Wald χ2 = 186.271, P < 0.001; df = 3, Wald χ2 = 1570.579, P < 0.001) were detected for callus induction rates.