The difference between the mean score of the sample and the diagnostic cut-off was highly significant for both tests (PCL-5: t (1248) = 24.70 , p < 0.001; MISS: t (1248) = 17.24 , p < 0.001).
Excerpts
Symptoms, Mental and Functional), the functional domain remained in the Poisson-model with a highly significant contribution (p=0.001).
There was high severity of periodontitis (for both in terms of CPI and LOA) in the dialysis group as compared with control group that was found to be statistically highly significant ( P <0.001).
However, the difference in microtumor volume in experiment 2 was highly significant, 0.010 ± 0.003 mm 3 versus 3.79 ± 1.24 mm 3 (treated versus controls, respectively), i.e., a 99.7% reduction ( p < 0.001).
Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA confirmed a significant effect of treatment ( F 1,9 =6.11, P =0.035) and a highly significant treatment × time interaction ( P <0.001).
Results PD1 was brightly expressed in 91.5% of the cases than control sample with highly significant difference ( P = .001).
GSEA performed to evaluate concordance in transcriptional profile between the n = 238 genes included in the commercially available endometrial receptivity array and the LH + 7 versus LH + 2 UF-EV comparison demonstrated an extremely significant and consistent enrichment, with a normalized enrichment score (NES)=9.38 ( P < 0.001) for transcripts up-regulated in LH + 7 in the commercial array and enriched in LH + 7 UF-EVs, and a NES = −5.40 ( P < 0.001) for transcripts down-regulated in LH + 7 in the commercial array and depleted in LH + 7 UF-EVs.
PDL was noticed in 73.3% of teeth in Group I and 62.5% of subjects in Group II and the findings were highly significant as compared to Group III ( P < 0.001).
Correlation estimates for the CARE items of space availability especially related to ability to integrate charting in workflow ( r = 0.42) and spend enough time with patients ( r = 0.41), followed by efficiency of moving throughout the unit ( r = 0.39), responding to patient needs ( r = 0.37), and getting help when needed ( r = 0.37) were all highly significant ( p < 0.001).
In a study done by El Baz et al [ 16 ], the malignant cases showed a highly significant increase in the mean percentage of expression of Fas in tissue compared to the chronic cystitis ( P < 0.001) group.
We found the association between the colposcopic impression and histopathology was highly significant ( P < 0.001) and the k value for the strength of correlation was 65.7% indicating good agreement.
The wines from the two locations showed significant differences at the p ≤ 0.01 for peonidin-3- O -glucoside and highly significant differences at p ≤ 0.001 for cyanidin-3- O -glucoside, flavonols (myricetin-3- O -glucoside, quercetin-3- O -glucoside, quercetin and isorhamnetin), all flavan-3-ols (except catechin), proanthocyanidins, and stilbenes.
The value of the LDH is higher in Hegazi (588.71 ± 188.87 U/l) than those of the Shami breed (261.66 ± 20.98 U/l) and this difference is statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Differences were considered statistically significant for P -values of <0.05 (*) or highly significant for P -values of <0.001 (**).
Neurological recovery was found to be highly significant ( p <0.001) by the Friedman ANOVA test.
A decreasing trend in NSE was more accurate than a decreasing trend in NFL levels in predicting good outcome (AUC 0.92 [0.85–0.98] versus 0.50 [0.36–0.64], respectively, p < 0.001) (ESM3 - Table S5 ).
The fixed effect of experiment was always highly significant ( P < 0.001) and is thus never provided.
6 ) showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
There was a highly significant effect of genotype on tolerance, as indicated (***, p<0.001), and also of pre-exposure duration, as well as a significant interaction between genotype and pre-exposure duration (two-way ANOVA; n = 4 (30 min and 50 min pre-exposure) or 8 (40 min pre-exposure).
We first focused our metabolic analysis on highly significant differences (p<0.001).
Highly significant associations ( P < 0.001) for RA were found for the homozygous C genotype in positions -607 and -137.
Mean HbA1c of patients who were taking metformin was 7.8 ± 1.4 as compared to patients who were not using metformin (8.4 ± 1.5), and this difference is highly significant (p<0.001) Similarly, the patients who were using metformin had high values of bicarbonate as compared to non-users (23 ±3 and 19.7± 3.4, respectively), and this difference is highly significant in the two groups (p<0.001).
The smooth term of the GAM was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
A highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) was observed in the bicaval view in the mid-esophagus, albeit with a small effect size (V = 0.2).
Among them, the social value shows a highly significant positive effect (β = 0.520, p < 0.001), followed by the economic value (β = 0.486, p < 0.001).