Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
*p <0.05 indicates significant difference, **p <0.01 indicates highly significant difference, ***p <0.001 indicates highly significant difference. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 In vitro analysis of the combined effect of CXB, ATO and IR820 The MTT assay was initially employed to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of the free drug on AKR cells and to determine the optimal combination ratio of CXB, ATO, and IR820 ( Fig. 1 A).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In fact, the Stroop effect was found for both, RTs and ERs: Overall, the effect of congruency was highly significant for RTs ( p < 0.001), with incongruent trials (mean RT = 682 ms; standard deviation SD = 148 ms) being answered 31 ms (or 5%) slower than congruent trials (mean RT = 652 ms, SD = 138 ms), as usual in the Stroop paradigm.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
At 2MIC, only 20% (5/25) formed strong biofilms (0.62 ± 0.14), 16% (4/25) moderate (0.48 ± 0.06), and 64% (16/25) weak (0.24 ± 0.07), showing a highly significant reduction compared to control and MIC groups (P < 0.001).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results showed that, compared to students with a “Vitality Type” lifestyle, those with a “Crisis Type” or “Adjustment Type” lifestyle had 6.99 times and 2.29 times the risk, respectively, of being at a low level of physical activity, with these differences being highly significant ( P < 0.001).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The mean length-to-width ratio varied from 1.520 -+ 0.376 SD to 1.858 +- 0.678 and always showed a highly significant increase (P < 0.001) over nonsheared controls (1.111 --_ 0.143 to 1.187 - 0.250).
Macrophage deformability and phagocytosis.
J Cell Biol · 1977 · PMC2111563