Excerpts

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The heterogeneity among operators was highly significant ( P value <0.001) and explained 44.5% of the total variability.

The association between subvariant classification and caseness was highly significant, χ2(3) = 64.191, p <.001, Cramér’s V = .771, a large effect.

A p -value < 0.05 (*) was considered significant between groups, p < 0.01 (**) highly significant, and p < 0.001 (***) extremely significant.

Compared with the control group, the differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The associated factors with the prevalence of allergic rhinitis were carpet (odds ratio [OR]: 1.79, p = 0.001), residential area (marginally significant), duration of residence (OR: 1.09, p < 0.001).

Self-efficacy in diagnosis and management of mental health problems approached significance; p < 0.001.

The improvement proportion revealed a decreasing trend (Cochran–Armitage Trend Test: Z = −5.277, p < 0.001) in the three subgroups of “almost naïve”, “partly naïve”, and “hardly naive”.

The oocyst exclusion in the dihydroartemisinin and silymarin groups was only one-third of that in the UCC group ( Figure 3 ), representing the most significant difference ( p < 0.0001), and that in the nerolidol group was two-thirds of that in the UCC group, representing an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.001).

Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ2(741) = 19,644.17, p < .001), further confirming the appropriateness of the analysis.

All second order interactions with subject were highly significant ( p < 0.001) indicating substantial individual variability in how thresholds were affected by stimulation mode, electrode location, and auditory training.

Pairwise comparisons of AUC among four indices in both gender were all highly significant (p < 0.001) except for the comparison between Cr/CysC and eGFR Diff .

The largest magnitude of difference was between NFTD and NLSD, with NFTD being 10.5 dB lower ( p < 0.001, highly significant).

The paired t-test showed a highly significant difference (t = 13.27, p < 0.001), suggesting improved fine and gross motor coordination, bilateral integration, and overall motor control after the intervention.

The C allele also had nominally significant effects on leucine (−1.2%, P = 0.001), tyrosine (+1.1%, P = 0.001), and histidine (+0.8%, P = 0.003).

We focused mainly on the highly significant results ( p ≤ 0.001) not allowing for the overinterpretation of weak signals or false positives.

Mean SAS-SV scores differed substantially between these two stratified groups and the comparison was highly significant (t (262) = -19.97, p < .001).

As shown in the leftmost column of Figure 7 A, integrating bin 1–10 together yields highly significant P < 0.001 and q = 6.67E-04 (length = 15–30).

The level of significance - P > 0.05 not significant, P < 0.05 significant, P < 0.01 highly significant, P < 0.001 very highly significant.

Both the functional (KO-based) profiles and the bacterial community compositions (16S rRNA gene-based) clustered according to soil developmental stage, as these consistently displayed highly significant goodness-of-fit measures ( RELATE ρ = 0.782, P < 0.001; Fig. 2b ).

Correlations between beta power and the simultaneously measured absolute force rate (see Methods section on Correlation between beta power and force ) were highly significant at the group level (ON: mean rho = −0.06, p < 0.001, t 17 = −4.7; OFF: mean rho = −0.08, p = 0.009, t 10 = −3.3).

After performing the systematic review and meta-analysis, it can be inferred that even when a high heterogeneity was attained (I 2 > 50%), all the random-effects models were highly significant ( p < 0.001) enough to arise differences between the groups and make it able to state that connective tissue graft is more effective than collagen matrices for soft tissues augmentation around both teeth and implants.

Between 1997 and 2004 the mean size of neophytes (mean CCL 99.3 cm, n = 1743 measurements, SD = 5.3 cm) was 1.8 cm smaller than that of remigrants (mean CCL 101.1 cm, n = 1599, SD = 5.3 cm), a difference that was highly significant ( t 3306 = 9.8, p < 0.001).

The levels of significance, relative arbitrary intensity and median log2 fold change of all highly significant ( p < 0.001, q < 0.001) m / z peaks contributing to class separation for OC/Normal and OC/BOT are shown in supplementary tables 6 and 7 .

There were highly significant differences among the three experimental groups ( P < 0.001, Figure 9A ).

Between day 7 and 14, there was a significant bAB increase in cohort 1 (z = −2.201, p = 0.028) and a highly significant in cohort 3 (z = −3.516, p < 0.001).