Excerpts

P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (∗), P < 0.01 was considered highly significant (∗∗), and P < 0.001 was considered extremely significant (∗∗∗). 2.24.

This represents a reduction of 23.5%, which is highly significant ( P < .001).

On the subsection relating to perceptions of health, two questions displaying significance ( P < 0.05; P < 0.01) and one highly significant ( P < 0.001), respectively, were as follows: “I am somewhat ill”; “I am as healthy as anybody I know”; and “I have been feeling bad lately”.

The relationship between home range and body size was highly significant for benthic ( F 1,125 = 151.2, p < 0.001) and pelagic species ( F 1,43 = 61.14, p < 0.001).

Protection of vaccinated mice against mortality from the homologous virus was highly significant ( p < 0.001), which demonstrates the vaccine's potency.

A significant reduction over time was found for the contributions of HI and PET ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively), but the HD and RC n contributions showed an increasing trend ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.12, respectively).

These criteria were highly significant in the distinction between patients according to disease recurrence (MC p = 0.001, UTS criteria p < 0.001, Asan criteria p < 0.001, AFP score p = 0.009).

In treatment T02, water uptake on the low-salinity side was 35.9% higher than on the high-salinity side, with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

Highly significant increase of numbers of positively stained hepatocytes was seen in hepatic sections from of treated group SF + CQ and SF + SV ( p < 0.001) when compared to the untreated HCC group (Fig. 6 a, b).

High dose dobutamine stress revealed highly significant differences between normal segments and segments with WMA (normal: -39.3 ± 11.3%; WMA: 19.2 ± 19.1%; p < 0.001) as well as between normal and stenotic and normal and remote segments (stenotic: -23.8 ± 15.9%, p < 0.001; remote: -34.2 ± 14.1%, p < 0.001).

Liver enzymes: AST decreased from ~ 70 U/L at baseline to ~ 20 U/L at 6 months, and ALT declined from ~ 100 U/L to ~ 25 U/L, both showing highly significant improvements ( P < 0.001).

Comet Assay Results The comet assay demonstrated a statistically highly significant increase in DNA damage (%DNA T ) at O. majorana extract concentrations of 100 and 200 μg/mL compared to the control group ( p < 0.001), whereas the 10 μg/mL concentration did not differ significantly from the control ( p > 0.05).

P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant, P < 0.01 was highly significant, and P < 0.001 was extremely significant.

Using these methods, 1015 cases of highly significant space- time clustering were identified (P< 0.001).

In this line, the contractile response to PE was tested and both compounds significantly reduced the contractile response to PE, although oxime–1 showed a more highly significant ( p < 0.001) reduction of the contractile response to different concentrations of PE (10 −7 to 10 −5 M).

When this categorical data is analyzed we find a highly significant relationship between types of studio audience and field study OAR co-occurring, χ 2 (2,306) = 27.790, p < 0.001, with a moderately strong relationship (Cramer’s V = 0.301).

The coadministration of FLZ (40 mg/kg) and Meth-Gin (200 mg/kg) substantially decreased the fungal load ( Figure 7A ), which was highly significant lower as compared to FLZ treatment alone (P<0.001).

There was a highly significant difference in concentration of clopidogrel carboxylic acid between the measurement time points in sheep ( p ≤ 0.001) and in lambs ( p = 0.005).

The difference is highly significant ( P <0.001).

Gaze position We found a highly significant difference between the four groups ( F 3 = 33.12, p < 0.001).

Results The results were subjected for appropriate statistical analysis; Kruskal–Wallis test revealed that intergroup comparison of the mean percentage of tubule occlusion was statistically highly significant ( P value < 0.001) [ Table 1 ] and Mann–Whitney U test showed that the tubule occlusion potential was statistically significant among all groups except for Group B and D which was not significant [ Table 2 and Figure 1 ].

Results There was a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001) of genotype (G) and environment (E) on all morphological traits of wheat plants ( Table 2 ).

Compared with cohort I and cohort II, the proportion of patients in “remission” and “continuous remission” in the cohort III group showed an increasing trend (17.3% vs. 23.9% vs. 46.6%, P <0.001; 6.3% vs. 6.6% vs. 10.6%, P <0.001) ( Table 3 ).

Overall, we observed a highly significant association between NfL and age (ρ = 0.65, p < 0.001).

This difference was highly significant (p < 0.001).