Excerpts

The difference between one- and two-talker conditions was highly significant for both groups ( Z = 4.87, p < 0.0001 for Boston, Z = 4.22, p < 0.0001 for Tsimane’, Wilcoxon signed-rank test); when expressed as sensitivity, Boston participants achieved a mean d -prime of 4.27, and Tsimane’ participants achieved a mean d -prime of 3.23.

hysiological parameters were age ( P < 0.0001), sex ( P = 0.002), HB ( P < 0.0005), cardiac troponin ( P = 0.006), CK-MB ( P = 0.04), eGFR ( P < 0.1), MAP, SI, MSI, AGE-SI, and Killip ( P < 0.0001) (Table 5 ). Multivariate logistic regression model defining significant predictors for mortality was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) (Table 6 ).

Differences between gray and white matter were highly significant (p < 0.0001), and epileptogenic zones showed significantly higher conductivity than healthy gray matter (p = 0.012), even when MRI was normal (p = 0.005).

Whether the scan was task or rest-based made a small but highly significant difference in the maps correlations (z = 0.40 vs. z = 0.36, t(446) = −6.50, P < 0.0001).

The results showed that, following correction, the pooled MD for DBP remained highly significant at −7.83 mmHg (95% CI: −9.88 to −5.79, p < 0.0001).

The apparent 10.2/7.6 mmHg difference between inpatients and outpatients was only slightly reduced to 8.0/5.1 mmHg after adjustment for baseline and remained highly significant (p < 0.0001/p < 0.0001) even after correction for cluster effects.

Significant (*), P < 0.05; very significant (**), P < 0.01; highly significant (***), P < 0.001; extremely significant (****), P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.

Every comparison reported highly significant differences: absolute initial angles for clockwise trials were smaller in the negative ( t 17 = -4.72, P < 10 −4 ) and positive contexts ( t 17 = -3.6, P = 0.001); for counter-clockwise perturbations the initial angles were also smaller in the negative ( t 17 = 4.03, P < 10 −4 ) and positive contexts ( t 17 = -3.61, P = 0.001, one-sided paired t-tests).

The number of patients experiencing exacerbations decreased only during treatment with mepolizumab, and in a statistically highly significant manner [odds ratio, 0.019; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.001–0.320; hazard ratio p < 0.0001].

Results The Procrustes ANOVA showed highly significant differences between calcanea, both in size and shape ( p < 0.0001).

This is a highly significant enrichment among all significant proteins in the dataset of that independent study (odds ratio 10, P < 0.0001, Fig EV5 B).

As Figure 2 B shows, the RNA expression levels of MyHC and Mef2C showed a continuous increasing trend and a significant increase in abundance ( p < 0.0001), while the RNA expression levels of MyoD and MyoG showed a trend of first increasing, downregulating from D0 to D5, and then peaking at D1 ( p < 0.0001, Figure 2 B).

The scraper inclination angle (X2) exhibited a highly significant main effect (F = 518.11, p < 0.0001), and its quadratic term (X22) was also highly significant (F = 833.74, p < 0.0001), demonstrating that scraper inclination had a pronounced influence on the application rate.

Results showed a highly significant difference between h SFs taken up by Pv EVs as opposed to h EVs (unpaired t -test ****p < 0.0001) (Supplementary Fig. 6 ).

GTACG haplotype of SH2B1 has a highly significant association with responders (P< 0.0001).

The effect of blood treatment on infection intensity was highly significant (LRT X 2 4 = 260; p < 0.0001, Fig. 3 B).

While the differ- ence in trichocyst content is highly significant (p < 0.0001), the amount of membranes fused is not different (even at p > 0.1; determined by U-test). dure (a serious risk, as we had learned in pilot experiments with commercial equipment) might have hampered its more general use.

The KM curves were drawn (as shown in Figure 6C ), and a markedly significant difference of p < 0.0001 was observed between the groups.

as shown in Figure 8A , high risk score group revealed a highly significant difference in worse prognosis ( P < 0.0001).

Statistical analysis demonstrated a highly significant difference between the two groups ( p < 0.0001).

The highly significant regression model was verified by a low P value ( P < 0.0001), which should be less than 0.05 [ 28 ].

These correlations are slightly reduced with Salmon derived correlations (R2 average 0.6) but remain always highly significant (each p-value < 0.0001).

Analysis results reported in Table 3 , as well as, the parameters which statistically indicated highly significant impact on the yield were linear term of pressure, CO 2 flow rate and time (p < 0.0001), followed using the quadratic term of flow rate(p < 0.0001).

basilicum , a highly significant elongation in the larval duration ( F = 25.63; df = 3, 378; P < 0.0001) was recorded.

For each peptide, the comparison between MS and controls by analyzing either mean seroreactivity values or the number of positive patients was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).